[To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh

2001-01-25 Thread Wayne_Johnson
I've almost got the CVS for MVS (AKA OS/390) port working, including binary and compression. At this point I'm trying to get through sanity.sh but am having a few problems. 1) Some of IBM's system messages like "update: cannot open CVS/Entries for reading: No such file or directory" actually

Re: [To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh

2001-01-25 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:23:37PM -0500, Larry Jones wrote: > > > 2) It seems that quite often the order that files are processed is different on > > > MVS. For example, in basicb-7, the output that is expected is: > > > 'T Emptydir/sfile1 > > > T sdir2/sfile2' > > > > > > but on MVS it's: > >

Re: [To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh

2001-01-25 Thread Derek R. Price
I cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] since more of the technical development discussions seem to go on there. Replies can probably safely remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the cc list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've almost got the CVS for MVS (AKA OS/390) port working, including binary and > compression. At

Re: [To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh

2001-01-25 Thread Larry Jones
Derek R. Price writes: > > I'd prefer, "update: cannot open CVS/Entries for reading: .*No such file or > directory\.?". The more data you can include and still match both cases, the > better. I'll second that. > (Is '?' valid? I forget. You might have to use \.* on the end there) No, '?' is

Re: [To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh

2001-01-29 Thread Wayne_Johnson
2001 05:36:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Wayne Johnson/MINN/Candle) Subject: Re: [To CVS-Dev] CVS Directory Order and sanity.sh On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:23:37PM -0500, Larry Jones wrote: > > > 2) It seems that quite often the order that files are processed is different o