proposed workaround (RE: Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how?)

2001-09-23 Thread Art Eschenlauer
Many thanks to Greg Woods and Eric Siegerman for setting me straight and giving me several helpful suggestions. Here is the approach and a procedure that I would like to take. (This is not to say that Eric's suggestions were inferior, but it is simply more tailored to our intranet

Re: proposed workaround (RE: Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how?)

2001-09-23 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 08:40:57AM -0500, Art Eschenlauer wrote: Assumptions, 6. DS1L is a super-sandbox repository at DS1, which is to say that it is where untested changes may be committed. Its hierarchy maintained identically with that of GMSL. Isn't this exactly the problem

Re: Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how?

2001-09-21 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 03:40:23PM -0500, Art Eschenlauer wrote: We need to discover or learn about a method whereby changes checked into one repository may be pulled into copies of that repository located at our multiple other locations; in effect, each repository must become the master for

Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how?

2001-09-21 Thread Art Eschenlauer
Greetings! We develop software using CVS as an SCM tool. Our developers are located at multiple sites linked by a moderate-speed, moderate-reliability network. CVSup seems like the tool to use to replicate. We need to discover or learn about a method whereby changes checked into one repository

Re: Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how?

2001-09-21 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Friday, September 21, 2001 at 15:40:23 (-0500), Art Eschenlauer wrote: ] Subject: Bidirectional repository synchronization with CVSup - how? We develop software using CVS as an SCM tool. Our developers are located at multiple sites linked by a moderate-speed, moderate-reliability