Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Kaz Kylheku
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To this end I've written a script which checks in as much or as little of /etc's text files as you want. And now I've found that CVS is getting in the way, by wiping the group and file and directory permissions of the files being added. (It

AW: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Schell Walter
]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2001 07:16 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem I've recently tackled a problem I've wanted to solve with CVS for a long time now - namely, managing the configuration of a Unix machine (especially desktop Linux machines

Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Mike Castle
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:15:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To this end I've written a script which checks in as much or as little of /etc's text files as you want. And now I've found that CVS is You might consider looking at cfengine, or something similar. You could then use cvs to

Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:25:34AM +, Kaz Kylheku wrote: So you see, it's a fundamental misconception that the conventional metadata on the CVS version files is actually part of the versioned content. True enough. If you want something to be versioned, you have to capture it in a file

Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Mark
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've recently tackled a problem I've wanted to solve with CVS for a long time now - namely, managing the configuration of a Unix machine (especially desktop Linux machines), via CVS. I do this to a certain extent as well. ... To this end I've written a script

Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread Kaz Kylheku
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Siegerman wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:25:34AM +, Kaz Kylheku wrote: So you see, it's a fundamental misconception that the conventional metadata on the CVS version files is actually part of the versioned content. True enough. If you want

Re: CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-13 Thread luke
On 13 Sep, Kaz Kylheku wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Siegerman wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 06:25:34AM +, Kaz Kylheku wrote: So you see, it's a fundamental misconception that the conventional metadata on the CVS version files is actually part of the versioned

CVS management of /etc - permissions problem

2001-09-12 Thread luke
I've recently tackled a problem I've wanted to solve with CVS for a long time now - namely, managing the configuration of a Unix machine (especially desktop Linux machines), via CVS. The rationale is that if I change a system config file, and months later discover that something has stopped