Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Yes, its documentation is still very bad. Nevertheless CVSTrac is a
really excellent tool when it comes to performance and tight CVS and
bug-tracking integration. For your problem (if docs would have existed
;-) the solution would have been to disable the writing of "pa
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003, Karl-König Königsson wrote:
> [...]
> _Please note, this is not a problem with cvstrac per se, but with me not
> reading all available info thougroughly. Cvstrac is lacking docs in the
> distro but this is not an excuse, mearly an observation._
> [...]
Yes, its documentation
Hi all,
I just had a scary few hours with CVS that I wanted to share with you.
My point with this blatant self-exposure is that I tried to find
information regarding this problem in the list archives, in the FAQ, in
the manual, in the Fogel book and on the web but to no avail. I suspect
that t
