Re: Importing vendor update without 1.1.1 branch

2001-01-05 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:01:49AM +, Kenn Humborg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 04:12:23PM -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote: > > I've scrambled enough repositories that I've come to think of > > importing as a dangerous operation > > Unfortunately, I was still under the impression that pretty

Re: Importing vendor update without 1.1.1 branch

2001-01-05 Thread Kenn Humborg
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 04:12:23PM -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote: > I've scrambled enough repositories that I've come to think of > importing as a dangerous operation -- dangerous enough to be > worth backing up the repository first. (Not that I'm scrupulous > about actually doing this, alas; there

Re: Importing vendor update without 1.1.1 branch

2001-01-05 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:48:32AM +, Kenn Humborg wrote: > Starting with an empty CVS tree, we did > >cvs import -b 2.2.14 module vendor vendor-2-2 > [...] > We continued development, adding files and modifying a few > vendor files. > > Now I'm trying to import an updated vendor tree [.

Importing vendor update without 1.1.1 branch

2001-01-04 Thread Kenn Humborg
Hopefully there's an easy way out of this one: Starting with an empty CVS tree, we did cvs import -b 2.2.14 module vendor vendor-2-2 This created files with versions 2.2.14.1 on the vendor branch 2.2.14. (Good intentions, bad idea) We continued development, adding files and modifying