Eric Siegerman writes:
>
> Why is it so long between official releases? I'm not sure, but
> here's one possibility: it takes quite a while to test a version
> well enough to declare it stable enough to be worthy of
> official-release status (this part's no guess :-) But the world
> won't hold
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 03:10:33PM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
> The only differentiation is between official releases (1.9, 1.10, etc.),
> which are stable and well tested, and interim release (1.10.1, 1.10.2,
> etc.), which may not be as stable and are not as well tested. I was
> speaking just of
Eric Siegerman writes:
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:01:54AM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
> > CVS has traditionally not differentiated between
> > new feature releases and bug fix releases, both are just interim
> > releases.
>
> Are there plans to so differentiate in future? There should be,
> I
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:01:54AM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
> CVS has traditionally not differentiated between
> new feature releases and bug fix releases, both are just interim
> releases.
Are there plans to so differentiate in future? There should be,
IMO. Especially since it has long claime
Laird Nelson writes:
>
> +1; CVS will get more corporate adoption that way. There's some
> hesitancy around here about going to 1.10.8 because it's not marked as a
> "stable" release.
And there should be -- CVS has traditionally not differentiated between
new feature releases and bug fix releas
Larry Jones wrote:
> There are always plans. ;-) Releases really need to be done by
> OpenAvenue and they've been busy enough just trying to figure out what
> they've got and what to do with it. Now that they've got a couple of
> dedicated people on board and they're getting up to speed, I'm ho
> Tony Cleveland wrote:
>
> Are there any plans of make another CVS point release to include the
> many fixes in the development version? Of course you can just run the
> development version but it would be nice to have a milestone that was
> designated at least some what stable.
+1; CVS will ge
Hello!
> There are always plans. ;-) Releases really need to be done by
> OpenAvenue and they've been busy enough just trying to figure out what
> they've got and what to do with it. Now that they've got a couple of
> dedicated people on board and they're getting up to speed, I'm hoping
> that
Tony Cleveland writes:
>
> Are there any plans of make another CVS point release to include the many
> fixes in the development version? Of course you can just run the development
> version but it would be nice to have a milestone that was designated at
> least some what stable.
There are always
Title: Next CVS release? (1.10.9?)
Are there any plans of make another CVS point release to include the many fixes in the development version? Of course you can just run the development version but it would be nice to have a milestone that was designated at least some what stable.
Tony
10 matches
Mail list logo
