I agree, but 1.9Mb is a bit too much isn't it? Something like 100kB
would be more than enough for me.
> On the other hand, it's sometimes useful to attach small things,
> like perl scripts. Unfortunately, some anti-virus filters seem to
> filter them out and complain to the list.
--
Marcel v
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcel van der Boom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:29 AM
> To: Scott McDermott
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1.9MB attachments (was Re: Wincvs download)
>
>
> Configuring the mail
Configuring the mailing-list to limit or forbid attachments would be
better IMHO.
> time for a blacklist entry :)
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
> he have to be stand in a corner and be shooten with a big caliber.
Zu schnell. Let him be slowly eaten by hungry rats.
--
Bitterness I understand, but let us not rail about justice while as long as
we have arms and the freedom to use them.
- Duke Leto Atreides "Dune"
Hi,
>
> tehee I wonder how big this 1.9 MB file sent to thousands of addresses
> would have been if it was simple text ;)
he have to be stand in a corner and be shooten with a big caliber.
Regards,
Ruprecht
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
