RE: Best practise with tagging

2004-10-12 Thread Jim.Hyslop
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guus Leeuw jr. Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Best practise with tagging Von: Jim.Hyslop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guus Leeuw jr. wrote:

RE: Best practise with tagging

2004-10-07 Thread Paras jain
There is already a document published for CVS best practices(look at that also, good one): http://www.magic-cauldron.com/cm/cvs-bestpractices/ Best Regards Paras -Original Message- From: Xanana Gusmao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 12:20 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: Best practise with tagging

2004-10-07 Thread Alastair Growcott
Title: AW: Best practise with tagging Err - you don't want to branch every release, just major releases. Minor releases presumably do not involve any major changes in functionality. Here at my company we tag every potentially public release (even though testing often means they never get

RE: Best practise with tagging

2004-10-07 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Guus Leeuw jr. wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before any public release of the software, you must tag the module. I would suggest Before any ... You must branch the module with a release tag I disagree. Branches can be very complex to manage. I

RE: Best practise with tagging

2004-10-07 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Xanana Gusmao wrote: I am compiling a short list of best practise for CVS usage especially for someone who's is the build engineer. Assuming that the source tree compiles and passes all tests and is basically ready to be deployed to production, I am recommneding that: Before any