[ On Friday, July 5, 2002 at 16:40:06 (-0500), Jay Yarbrough wrote: ]
> Subject: Keeping multiple CVS repositories in sync
>
> We have only recently begun to use CVS as our primary repository. It
> is hosted on a solaris-8 platform. We are also sub-contracting some
> of our software to remote de
> We have only recently begun to use CVS as our primary repository. It is
hosted on a solaris-8 platform. We are also sub-contracting some of our
software to remote developers who will only have access to Win32 systems.
Due to the flakey internet connections between their site and ours, it i
synchronized
repositories. Our preference would be to find a way to do this with CVS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:57 AM
To: Jay Yarbrough
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keeping multiple CVS repositories in sync
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: Jay Yarbrough
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Keeping multiple CVS repositories in sync
>
>
> > We have only recently begun to use CVS as our primary repository. It is
> hosted on a sola
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jay Yarbrough wrote:
> Thank you for your response.
>
> It would appear for anyone who truly needs multiple repositories kept in sync,
> that CVS is an unacceptable tool. This is most unfortunate.
>
> Our remote developers often cannot even get access to the internet.
> In
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jay Yarbrough wrote:
> It would appear for anyone who truly needs multiple repositories kept in sync,
> that CVS is an unacceptable tool. This is most unfortunate.
Correct. Various kludges have been suggested on this list, and
maybe even used successful
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:12:47PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Jay Yarbrough wrote:
> > It would appear for anyone who truly needs multiple repositories kept in sync,
> > that CVS is an unacceptable tool. This is most unfortunate.
>
> Correct. Variou
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:30:35PM -0400, Donald Sharp wrote:
> You
> then have the ability to push and pull change sets to other
> bk repositories. The ability to update the bk repository
> is of course predicated upon a network connection ;)
Yah, but if the connection's flaky (as seems to be t
