On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:04:54AM -0700, Larry Lords wrote:
> I have a question on Jim's statement "Private branches are never considered
> candidates for releases or for builds".
The operative word is "private".
> I have always understood that a company
> would always release from a private bra
There are private branches, and there are private branches. In the context
that you describe, the integration branch is private to the builders who
gate the release of the product. Jim refers instead to a branch that's
private to the developer performing the work.
Branches are a general tool for
I have a question on Jim's statement "Private branches are never considered
candidates for releases or for builds". I have always understood that a company
would always release from a private branch. This assumes when a release process
begins a release branch is created and final testing begins o
