Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-28 Thread Steve Sapovits
Getting back to my original issue here: I did an update -d but the Entries file remains the same. When I checkout to a clean area, I get a full Entries file. Is there something else I have to do to sync the Entries files up? With the partial file, the other commands run from that root directory

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-20 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello, * On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:15:42AM +0200 I wrote: > > Actually, though, I should think a 'cvs update -P ABC' followed by a > > 'cvs update -ld abc' should do the trick for you. > > Thanks, Jim! This is the solution to my problem. Doing some more tests, this is not a solution to the pr

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-20 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello Frederic, * On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:31:39PM -0400 Frederic Brehm wrote: > How about renaming the *repository* directory ABC to abc? Try it (in a > copy of the repository) and see if it breaks anything that you care > about. Thank you for this suggestion. I already tried it, but without

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-20 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello Jim, * On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:33:48PM -0400 Jim.Hyslop wrote: > I see. That's a tricky one to overcome. Sometimes, you just gotta bend > the rules a little: how important is it, really, for everything to be > lower-case? Of course, this is all perfect hind-sight, and doesn't > help you

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Steve Sapovits
Jim.Hyslop wrote: I'm not entirely clear on what exactly you're trying to achieve. Could you rephrase what you're trying to do, but leave out any references to the CVS/Entries file? I'm not sure. Maybe someone can help explain to me how I ended up where I am and we can go from there. We had a larg

RE: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
I wrote: > Actually, though, I should think a 'cvs update -P ABC' > followed by a 'cvs > update -ld abc' should do the trick for you. Sorry, the -l option wouldn't be necessary: 'cvs update -d abc' -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.

RE: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > Well, renaming ABC/ to abc/ was a deliberate decision as all > directories > should be lowercase on our side. We did not know that CVS has such a > problem with this. I see. That's a tricky one to overcome. Sometimes, you just gotta bend the rules a little: how important

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Frederic Brehm
How about renaming the *repository* directory ABC to abc? Try it (in a copy of the repository) and see if it breaks anything that you care about. Fred Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: Hello Jim, * On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:31:33PM -0400 Jim.Hyslop wrote: If you get into that situation, then the soluti

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello Jim, * On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:31:33PM -0400 Jim.Hyslop wrote: > If you get into that situation, then the solution is to (a) go rap > somebody's knuckles, then (b) fix the collision in the repository. Well, renaming ABC/ to abc/ was a deliberate decision as all directories should be lo

RE: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > * On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:53:28AM -0400 Jim.Hyslop wrote: > > > As a side note, though: don't be poking around the Entries > file. There > > is rarely, if ever, any need to examine the contents of the file. > > You mean, do not poke around with them unless you are

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
* On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:53:28AM -0400 Jim.Hyslop wrote: > As a side note, though: don't be poking around the Entries file. There > is rarely, if ever, any need to examine the contents of the file. You mean, do not poke around with them unless you are working on a Windows system, the server

RE: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Steve Sapovits wrote: > I agree. We got ourselves into a weird state where I'd like > to be able > to have Entries reflect what can be updated so I can start at the root > and selectively update pieces. In its current state it > thinks there are > only two subdirectories. But I think doing 'cv

Re: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Steve Sapovits
Jim.Hyslop wrote: Sure. Just issue a 'cvs update -d' command. That will retrieve any new files and directories. I was wondering if there was a way to do that without retrieving any files. As a side note, though: don't be poking around the Entries file. There is rarely, if ever, any need to examine

RE: updating Entries files only

2005-04-19 Thread Jim.Hyslop
Steve Sapovits wrote: > I think I asked this before, but I can't find it: Is there a way to > update just the CVS/Entries files so they reflect the current > directory > structure that's checked in? Sure. Just issue a 'cvs update -d' command. That will retrieve any new files and directories. As a