Julien Wajsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > How about modifying this ?
> >
> > I believe it would be a waste of time. There is still an 'enhancement'
> > request http://ccvs.cvshome.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27 to have the
> > verifymsg processed only once rather than for each directory...
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> Julien Wajsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just saw that 'verifymsg' is processed before 'importinfo' with your
> > patch. I don't think it is the correct behaviour :)
>
> I suggest that you should not depend on the ordering of the verifymsg as
> compared to the
Julien Wajsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just saw that 'verifymsg' is processed before 'importinfo' with your
> patch. I don't think it is the correct behaviour :)
I suggest that you should not depend on the ordering of the verifymsg as
compared to the importinfo or commitinfo.
In client/
I just saw that 'verifymsg' is processed before 'importinfo' with your
patch.
I don't think it is the correct behaviour :)
How about modifying this ?
Somewhere before the call to do_verify ?
--
Julien Wajsberg
--
Answer to Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
--
On Tue, J
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> > Any possibility to make it a feature of the mainstream CVS?
> [...]
> Also, the patch should not be conditional on the macros RSE_PATCHES or
> RSE_PATCH_IMPORTINFO, so those parts of the patch need to be removed.
> [...]
Sure, the #ifdef/#endif wra
Wu Yongwei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any possibility to make it a feature of the mainstream CVS?
Patches against the cvs trunk (1.12.1.1) that include sanity.sh test
cases to exercise the new feature will be considered.
Only bug fixes are going into the cvs 1.11.x branch, so this feature
wi
Any possibility to make it a feature of the mainstream CVS?
Best regards,
Wu Yongwei
cvs-import.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs