[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:38:37 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
> If you think that this is obvious, then Heisenberg requires that
> someone else would think that the obvious response would be to
> diff the latest version on the
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:30:04 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>>
>> Greg A. Woods writes:
>> >
>> > It seems to me that it would be most logical and most
I will be out of the office until August 11. Thank you, Heather
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
[ On Sunday, August 3, 2003 at 20:30:04 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
> Greg A. Woods writes:
> >
> > It seems to me that it would be most logical and most elegant to simply
> > use the combination of '-r'
Greg A. Woods writes:
>
> It seems to me that it would be most logical and most elegant to simply
> use the combination of '-r' and '-D' when a date on a particular branch
> is desired:
>
> cvs [r]diff -r branch-1 -D date-1 -r branch-2 -D date-2
Unfortunately, it's impossibly ambiguous u
>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 07:47:09 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>>
>> I think that the -D "timestamp" is documented as doing timestamps on the
>> tr
[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 16:36:09 (+0200), Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
> And I would expect diff to use the sticky branch tag by
> default. The other cvs commands need an explicit -r HEAD
> to refer to the trunk.
[ On Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 07:47:09 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
> I think that the -D "timestamp" is documented as doing timestamps on the
> trunk rather than a branch at present. The "right thing" to d
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark D. Baushke
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:49 PM
> > To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
> > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: Strange dif
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark D. Baushke
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
>
> Okay. It appears that the 'feature' of be
Hi Michael,
Okay. It appears that the 'feature' of being able to mix tags and dates
needs to be resolved and introduced into the trunk version of cvs as it
is not yet present in the cvshome.org version of cvs.
-- Mark
___
Info-cvs mailing list
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark D. Baushke
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:14 AM
> To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
>
> Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: Mark D. Baushke
> > Does the command:
> >
> > cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
> >
> > work for you?
>
> Not really:
>
> $ cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
> cvs diff: koucopy.sh was removed, no compa
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark D. Baushke
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:16 PM
> To: Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Strange diff behavior on branch
>
>
> Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Lemke, Michael IZ/HZA-IC1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not having seen a single reply I try again and ask:
Does the command:
cvs diff -r B_PROD -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
work for you?
Right now you are asking to compare the mainline version of 16-jul-2003
to the checked out copy and cvs
Not having seen a single reply I try again and ask:
> I have a file that was initially added on a branch. If I
> do a diff based on a date I get this:
>
> $ cvs diff -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
> cvs diff: koucopy.sh is a new entry, no comparison available
> $ cvs stat koucopy.sh
> ==
I have a file that was initially added on a branch. If I
do a diff based on a date I get this:
$ cvs diff -D 16-jul-2003 koucopy.sh
cvs diff: koucopy.sh is a new entry, no comparison available
$ cvs stat koucopy.sh
===
File: koucopy
17 matches
Mail list logo