Re: Update versions

2003-07-10 Thread Giovanni Giazzon
nk and I'll be using branches just for bug fixing. Regards, Giovanni Giazzon - Original Message - From: "Dewey M. Sasser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:41 PM Subject: Re: Update versions > "Giovanni Giazz

RE: Update versions

2003-07-10 Thread Yuval Rotem
be a nightmare. More advanced tools keep a graph of file versions, so they can do much better). Yuval. -Original Message- From: Dewey M. Sasser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Update versions "Giovanni Giazzon" <

Re: Update versions

2003-07-10 Thread Terrence Enger
At 11:41 2003-07-10 -0400, Dewey M. Sasser wrote: >"Giovanni Giazzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Yes, I'm a little confused about branches. So was I, though I lacked the sense to realize it. > >Let me describe how I've used and seen branches. That might help you >out. > [substantive infor

Re: Update versions

2003-07-10 Thread Dewey M. Sasser
"Giovanni Giazzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I'm a little confused about branches. Let me describe how I've used and seen branches. That might help you out. > Sorry about the misunderstanding. I'm coming from SourceSafe... Ouch! Congratulations. You've just traded in your bicycle fo

Re: Update versions

2003-07-09 Thread Larry Jones
Giovanni Giazzon writes: > > Yes, I'm a little confused about branches. Then please go read the relevant section of the manual: Unless you have a really good reason (and I'm pretty sure you don't), you shouldn't be using b

Re: Update versions

2003-07-09 Thread Giovanni Giazzon
PROTECTED]> To: "Giovanni Giazzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: Re: Update versions > Giovanni Giazzon writes: > > > > I agree with you, but we're facing some problems regarding adminis

Re: Update versions

2003-07-09 Thread Larry Jones
Giovanni Giazzon writes: > > I agree with you, but we're facing some problems regarding administrative > access. We can't remove branches and versions. Each one we create remains in > the repository as garbage. But I guess someone in the list told that if you > remove a branch, the version created

Re: Update versions

2003-07-09 Thread Giovanni Giazzon
ll also be removed. Is this true? Regards, Giovanni Giazzon - Original Message - From: "Larry Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Giovanni Giazzon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:18 PM Subject: Re: Update versions

Re: Update versions

2003-07-08 Thread Larry Jones
Giovanni Giazzon writes: > > my problem is that I want to update an existing version. For each deploy we > have a version, but sometimes bugs show up and we have to update these > versions. It is possible to update versions? I know that I can't commit on > versions and the on

RE: Update versions

2003-07-08 Thread Zieg, Mark
#x27;t necessarily need branches to do this. (But if you honestly are trying to perform an isolated bugfix on a historical release, then yes, you really should create a branch.) -Original Message- From: Giovanni Giazzon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:23 AM To: [

Update versions

2003-07-08 Thread Giovanni Giazzon
Hi all, my problem is that I want to update an existing version. For each deploy we have a version, but sometimes bugs show up and we have to update these versions. It is possible to update versions? I know that I can't commit on versions and the only solution seems to create a new branch of