Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it,
but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
Chris
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Yep. The site has been down for about a week now. (http://www.regexps.com/)
I haven't done much with it yet. It seems powerful, but somewhat confusing
to use; I think that's a direct function of not having done much with it.
:-)
___
Info-cvs mailin
> Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it,
> but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
>
Do you have any sort of URL? "arch" isn't something that lends
itself to a Google search, so I don't really know where t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it,
>> but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
>>
> Do you have any sort of URL? "arch" isn't something that lends
> itself to a Google
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it,
> >> but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion.
> >>
> > Do you have any sort of URL? "arch" isn't something that
To be precise, arch (larch, really) has had a presence. In fact, the
developer is already "eating his own dog food" and has the larch repo
available under larch.
I think that he's merely upgrading his apache server. What I downloaded is
most certainl
"Mark A. Flacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The arch site is back up.
Thanks! Yes it is!
Chris
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
