-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: checking links into source control
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku) writes:
Not combining unrelated responsibilities
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku) writes:
Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
necessarily a limitation. What would you say about an e-mail application
that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem repair tool?
Microsoft Outlook owns that market.
--
Mark
In article 9nsp7c$ocm$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Jackson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku) writes:
Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
necessarily a limitation. What would you say about an e-mail application
that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem
way.
So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic goal?
All of that can be managed by the build system. You don't need it in
cvs.
well, technically you don't *need* cvs either. you could do fine with rcs. In
fact, programmers would probably live longer
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Edward Peschko wrote:
way.
So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic goal?
All of that can be managed by the build system. You don't need it in
cvs.
[...]
I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process
In article SUdo7.8142$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Kaz Kylheku wrote:
I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process because of
limitations in a tool.
Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
necessarily a limitation. What would you say about an e-mail
[ On Thursday, September 13, 2001 at 18:50:52 (-0700), Edward Peschko wrote: ]
Subject: Re: checking links into source control
well, technically you don't *need* cvs either. you could do fine with rcs. In
fact, programmers would probably live longer and get a better suntan if they
gave up
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Edward Peschko wrote:
way.
So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic goal?
All of that can be managed by the build system. You don't need it in
cvs.
[...]
I shouldn't be told what needs to be
