Paul vL writes:
>
> I'm a happy cvs user for many years. One of the more annoying things however
> is the behaviour of
> cvs -n up for large working directories; I use a global -q option to trim
> down output, but
> still get an enormous list (200+) of '?' before I get my one or two 'M'
> entri
Paul vL wrote:
> I'm a happy cvs user for many years. One of the more annoying
> things however is the behaviour of
> cvs -n up for large working directories; I use a global -q
> option to trim down output, but
> still get an enormous list (200+) of '?' before I get my one
> or two 'M' entries.
Hello all,
I'm a happy cvs user for many years. One of the more annoying things however is
the behaviour of
cvs -n up for large working directories; I use a global -q option to trim down
output, but
still get an enormous list (200+) of '?' before I get my one or two 'M' entries.
Using -Q will ma
