On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:02:44PM -0600, David Everly wrote:
> I was also thinking maybe read/write locks for
> branches, just in case the branches ever needed to be 're-activated'.
That doesn't exist in vanilla CVS. There's been a lot of
discussion about it of late, along with patches I think.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:18:23PM -0600, David Everly wrote:
> After I merge a branch into the trunk, I would like to make it so that
> people cannot commit to the branch anymore. Would someone please suggest
> a good way of doing this?
Would it suffice to "cvs rm" everything on the branch, so
Yes, this might work...I was also thinking maybe read/write locks for
branches, just in case the branches ever needed to be 're-activated'.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 04:22:58PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:18:23PM -0600, David Everly wrote:
> > After I merge a branch in
Write a commitinfo script to lock the branch.
Thanks
Shubho
-Original Message-
From: David Everly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:56 PM
Subject: killing a branch
>Hello,
>
>After I merge a bra
Hello,
After I merge a branch into the trunk, I would like to make it so that
people cannot commit to the branch anymore. Would someone please suggest
a good way of doing this?
Thanks,
Dave.
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu
