[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/13/2000 11:47:53 PM
Although I would lean towards honouring the "add" request, it might be
prudent to at least print a warning message indicating that the
directory would normally have been ignored if it had been traversed from
the "root" of the module instead of
[ On Thursday, March 9, 2000 at 10:11:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:27:12 PM
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:23:10 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:47:39 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 03:18:04 PM
Even still, what's wrong with an 'all-in-one' to add something to the module
file as well? (or are you of the 'if it can be in a script, it mustn't be in
the regular program' camp?)
I know I'm in the 'if it can be in a script, it mustn't be in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:27:12 PM
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 09:39:03 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
What if the
final lines were "cvs add" instead of "cvs add file"?
Now that's a good question.
"Greg A. Woods" wrote:
Make sure that you don't permit 'cvs co mispelling' to create a new
directory when 'cvs co misspelling' was intended.
If you spell it right in the "CVSROOT/modules" entry then all should be
well... :-)
How about 'cvs new module-name module-dir local-dir' to
[ On Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 21:23:34 (-0600), Michael Gersten wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
Even still, what's wrong with an 'all-in-one' to add something to the module
file as well? (or are you of the 'if it can be in a script, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
Please help me out here. I'm trying to figure out where our disconnect is.
I'm saying that "cvs watch"
On 6 Mar 2000, at 9:37, Noel L Yap wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[SNIP]
What do you think it does in order for
it to work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/06/2000 12:33:39 PM
On 6 Mar 2000, at 9:37, Noel L Yap wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 16:04:27
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 11:18:50 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the
server
[SNIP]
What
[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 09:37:33 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
I think either CVS should require CVSROOT/modules or it shouldn't. Your
proposal is an "in between" decision that could confuse people. The way I
[ On Monday, March 6, 2000 at 11:38:41 (-0600), Michael Gersten wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
Make sure that you don't permit 'cvs co mispelling' to create a new
directory when 'cvs co misspelling' was intended.
If you spell it right in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.03.03 15:52:50
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 09:19:44 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
OK, then, why do you say it's essential. Also, my poll says otherwise.
Noone
has responded to my poll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/02/2000 05:03:06 PM
[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 09:51:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/01/2000 09:45:14 PM
NO, it must *NOT*! There is a very very essential
[ On Friday, March 3, 2000 at 09:19:44 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
OK, then, why do you say it's essential. Also, my poll says otherwise. Noone
has responded to my poll saying that they agree that "cvs add
[ On Thursday, March 2, 2000 at 11:37:10 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
You are failing to
understand the temporal nature of CVS (its most central reason for
being!). This command does in fact operate on the files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/29/2000 12:38:16 PM
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
You're absolutely correct again. If someone has a .cvsignore file listing
all
their empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/29/2000 01:08:54 PM
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 09:00:01 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
In order for "cvs add empty-hier; cvs ci" to work properly, "cvs ci" will
have
to be changed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 16:57:30 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
Again, you're absolutely right. Users shouldn't rely on the optimisation you
propose. They
Noel L Yap
02/29/2000 08:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
(Document link not converted)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
[ On Monday, February 28, 2000 at 16:57:30 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
You're absolutely correct again. If someone has a .cvsignore file listing all
their empty directories and does "cvs add; cvs ci", those empty
[ On Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 08:34:25 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/28/2000 10:01:35 PM
Hmm... really? Are you really sure you know what kinds of
optimisations I'm talking about?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/26/2000 02:23:11 PM
[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:28:11 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
"cvs add" must specially handle empty
--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
"cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies such that no CVS
admin subdirectories are created within them. (I've tried to be as unbiased
with this statement as I can).
Please
[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:17:17 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
I'm not going to respond to any more of your crap. If you want to have
a sane academic debate about some of the finer details of my "cvs add"
[ On Friday, February 25, 2000 at 20:28:11 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
I want to take a poll with regards to the following issue:
"cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies such that no CVS
admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.25 18:16:18
[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 20:50:24 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.24 17:17:25
[ On Thursday, February 24, 2000 at 13:34:36 (-0500),
From: Noel L Yap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:28 PM
"cvs add" must specially handle empty directory hierarchies
such that no CVS
admin subdirectories are created within them.
neutral.
The real issue with me is that, due to the fact that they are not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2000.02.20 21:38:59
[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should create CVS admin
subdirectories
whether or not the
Noel Yap wrote:
Beware of premature optimisation. We've already laid out a process that
relies
on empty directories being created in the repo. IOW, it's *necessary* to
allow
creation of empty directories for this process. It would be a kludge to
create
a dummy file for this purpose.
At 09:38 PM 2/20/00, you wrote:
[ On Friday, February 18, 2000 at 16:52:48 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
What I'm getting at is that "cvs add dir" should create CVS admin
subdirectories
whether or not the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/17/2000 11:12:14 PM
[ On Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 17:42:28 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
This is fine by me. Again, note that the above doesn't mention "cvs add
empty-hier" at all.
[ On Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 17:42:28 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
This is fine by me. Again, note that the above doesn't mention "cvs add
empty-hier" at all.
I'm not sure what you're getting at by that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 12:50:51 AM
My proposal was an RFC of sorts -- eventually it will come with "working
code" to prove the concept (just as the original release of CVS offered
a way to prove the validity of the copy-modify-merge paradigm). The
final pudding will be in how widely
[ On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 12:43:31 (-0500), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
"cvs add dir" *must* operate on the local directory in so far as to create CVS
admin subdirectories within those local directories. It should
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 9:19 AM
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 09:18:18 (-0500), John
Macdonald wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to
contact the server
Oh? When is the last time that you
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 11:38:33 (-0800), Jerry Nairn wrote: ]
Subject: RE: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server....
So, after you're done, I will have to create a directory in the repository
so that cvs will accept a file in a directory in a work area?
Noel Yap wrote:
[...]
Taking another stance, "cvs add dir" will still act on files within dir.
The
difference with my proposition is that "dir/CVS" will be created whether
or not
there're files within the hierarchy. And, "dir" will get created upon
"cvs ci"
whether or not
[ On Tuesday, February 15, 2000 at 10:00:51 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
Hah. So when I "cvs co module" those directories module, module/foo,
and module/bar just spring into existance at the magic whim of the
[ On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:23:12 (-0500), John Macdonald wrote: ]
Subject: Re: removing the need for "cvs add file" to contact the server
When a user creates a new file on the file system he first does a
mkdir and then edits the file. How does it *hurt* CVS if the user
first
40 matches
Mail list logo
