Re: updating CVS server

2002-03-14 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Eric Siegerman | On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:31:39PM -0500, Arcin Bozkurt - Archie wrote: | | building from source did not work, because config script thought we had | kerberos although we had sun. We found the new executable and replaced | with the old one... | | Solaris 8, right? Known

updating CVS server

2002-03-07 Thread Arcin Bozkurt - Archie
is replacing the cvs executable we have (1.11) with 1.11.1p1 safe? We are doing this on the server. The clients are all 1.11.1p1. building from source did not work, because config script thought we had kerberos although we had sun. We found the new executable and replaced with the old one...

Re: updating CVS server

2002-03-07 Thread Larry Jones
Arcin Bozkurt - Archie writes: building from source did not work, because config script thought we had kerberos although we had sun. We found the new executable and replaced with the old one... Any problems? Shouldn't be, but it's always a good ideas to check NEWS for important changes:

Re: updating CVS server

2002-03-07 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:31:39PM -0500, Arcin Bozkurt - Archie wrote: is replacing the cvs executable we have (1.11) with 1.11.1p1 safe? We are doing this on the server. The clients are all 1.11.1p1. This should be fine, as far as I know. building from source did not work, because config