Ilan Rabinovitch schrieb:
Hello Christian,
Any chance I can get a look at your sendmail.mc or sendmail.cf files. Im
trying to accomplish the same as you but following your thread of e-mails on
the list I cant seem to reach the same poitn as you.
Thanks,
Ilan
I solved it! I tried to deliver
Something in CVS 2.2 changed since 26 Sept 2002 that apparently makes
for trouble compiling it under Red Hat 7.3.
(1) The first issue is probably just the a lack of a #include
before using a struct tm in lib/mkgmtime.c (make output
at end of message). There is a similar omission (of #include
) i
I've just committed the initial version of the LDAP ptloader code to the
2.2 CVS branch.
Many caveats:
a) no documentation yet (other than the imapd.conf options, which should
be most of what you need).
b) I'm not quite sure what to do with realms.
c) I want some of the people more experienced wi
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>This is all working fine, except that I had to add my dummy authentication user
>(which I create solely for Exim to authenticate itself to lmtpd with) to the
>"admins" entry in /etc/imapd.conf. I had to do this because lmptd spe
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
--On Friday, January 03, 2003 12:48 PM -0700 "Kevin P. Fleming"
wrote:
> This is all working fine, except that I had to add my dummy
> authentication user (which I create solely for Exim to authenticate
> itself to lmtpd with) to the "admins" entry in /etc/imapd.conf.
--On Friday, January 03, 2003 12:48 PM -0700 "Kevin P. Fleming"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is all working fine, except that I had to add my dummy
authentication user (which I create solely for Exim to authenticate
itself to lmtpd with) to the "admins" entry in /etc/imapd.conf. I had to
do th
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Amos Gouaux wrote:
> rs> There's no reason regular users should be submitting to the LMTP server,
> rs> they should be submitting using SMTP to an SMTP server, and then the LMTP
> rs> server trusts the SMTP server. This (admitedly marginaly) simplifies the
> rs> authorization
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:55:10 -0500 (EST),
> Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (rs) writes:
rs> There's no reason regular users should be submitting to the LMTP server,
rs> they should be submitting using SMTP to an SMTP server, and then the LMTP
rs> server trusts the SMTP server. This (
I have modified my configuration here so that now my MTA (Exim 4.12) uses
RFC2554 authentication to identify itself to lmtpd. This was done so that Exim
could supply AUTH= on the MAIL FROM: line, thus eliminating the need
to add "anyone p" ACLs to subfolders in order to allow direct subfolder de
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> This is all working fine, except that I had to add my dummy authentication user
> (which I create solely for Exim to authenticate itself to lmtpd with) to the
> "admins" entry in /etc/imapd.conf. I had to do this because lmptd specifically
> allows onl
Has anybody on the list made a detailed doc about
howto restore the maildb in case of disaster ?
I mean a short, quick note with step-by-step commands
to execute, to quickly get back in business ?
If for some reason the system crashes, it sure would have
been nice to have a doc at hand to quickly
Hello,
This is practically verbatim what we do at NCSU.
We create a folder named BACKUP in their regular inbox and then
restore their account from the requested date to that folder.
Subscriptions need to be updated and quotas set for the
BACKUP folder. We then delete it after two weeks. :)
We do l
Hi,
> If you're just going to use sasldb, use the "auxprop" pwcheck_method, and
> don't bother with saslauthd.
>
ok. This has solved my problem ;-)
Thx.
Regards,
Michael Obster
hunt wrote:
>
> H,
> I am wondering if there has been any patch for the big5 charset
> message header.
> ( I mean always use big5 charset to encode/decode message header).
> For chinese usage, this is kind of obvious issue. But I can not find
> any.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
> Danny Garcia Hernandez wrote:
>
> hello list!!!
>
> the year begun, but for me it´s time to go and work :( .
>
> well, here is my problem. i have a linux box running cyrus imapd
> server (2.1.9) with cyrus-sasl (2.1.9)and compiled with
> "--with-auth=unix". all is working fine!!!.
>
> right
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Michael Obster wrote:
> where can I say which one saslauthd should use.
> Btw. I have tried to give saslauthd the mechanism by:
> saslauthd -a sasldb ...
> but i get an unknown mechanism error. other methods also tried and there i get the
>same.
If you're just going to use sa
Hi,
> Are you logging cyrus (local6.debug) and SASL (auth.debug)? If so, what do
> they say?
auth.log:
Jan 3 11:16:06 gutmann saslauthd[1536]: START: saslauthd 2.1.10
Jan 3 11:16:06 gutmann saslauthd[1536]: FATAL: no authentication mechanism specified
Jan 3 11:16:53 gutmann imapd[1544]: unkno
H,
I am wondering if there has been any patch for the big5 charset
message header.
( I mean always use big5 charset to encode/decode message header).
For chinese usage, this is kind of obvious issue. But I can not find
any.
Any help is appreciated. Thaks.
hunt
Hi,
I am wondering if there has been any patch for the big5 charset
message header.
( I mean always use big5 charset to encode/decode message header).
For chinese usage, this is kind of obvious issue. But I can not find
any.
Any help is appreciated. Thaks.
hunt
hello list!!!
the year begun, but for me it´s time to go and
work :( .
well, here is my problem. i have a linux box
running cyrus imapd server (2.1.9) with cyrus-sasl (2.1.9)and compiled with
"--with-auth=unix". all is working fine!!!.
right now, we are hosting another domains and we
20 matches
Mail list logo
