Re: MTAs that pass SMTP AUTH?

2003-03-31 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott Balmos wrote: My question is, where is Sendmail getting, or even sending to the deliver program, the information that says to match against username msmith, johndoe, or whatnot? I know of the -a switch for deliver, but pretty much all the other MTAs (including Postfix) say that there can o

Re: Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread dimon
Quoting Igor Brezac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If you have define(`_VIRTUSER_STOP_ONE_LEVEL_RECURSION_', `1')dnl and a > mailertable entry for domain.com, this will work. > I did that and that's what I've got: Mar 31 16:45:21 mail sm-mta[90664]: h2VNjL2r090664: SYSERR(root): rewrite: map macro

Re: MTAs that pass SMTP AUTH?

2003-03-31 Thread Scott Balmos
Okay, maybe this might be a better question... In the O'Reilly "Managing IMAP" example (http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html#91630), it discusses the setup I need, where some folders have per-user +p access. In the example case, msmith and johndoe. It says that msmith & johndo

Re: Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread Igor Brezac
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You mean I should have records in virtusertable for all my users? If I want to > forward all mail coming to unexistent users I must have records for all valid > users in that domain, right? > Like this: > [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Groups

2003-03-31 Thread dimon
I'm using 'saslauthd -a pam' for IMAP authentication (pam_pgsql actually) and compiled cyrus-imapd22 --with-auth=unix Should I still use /etc/groups for group membership? Best regards, Dmitry

Re: Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread dimon
You mean I should have records in virtusertable for all my users? If I want to forward all mail coming to unexistent users I must have records for all valid users in that domain, right? Like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] ??? But it doesn't make sense. Quoting Igor Brezac <[EM

Re: Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread Igor Brezac
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > How can I configure Curus IMAP v 2.2 to forward all incoming mail to unexistent > > users in specific domain to specific email address. > > Since v 2.2 supports virtual domains I'm not using Sendmail's virtusertable

Re: Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How can I configure Curus IMAP v 2.2 to forward all incoming mail to unexistent > users in specific domain to specific email address. > Since v 2.2 supports virtual domains I'm not using Sendmail's virtusertable any > more. But I'm missing this important feature :-(

Unexistent user

2003-03-31 Thread dimon
How can I configure Curus IMAP v 2.2 to forward all incoming mail to unexistent users in specific domain to specific email address. Since v 2.2 supports virtual domains I'm not using Sendmail's virtusertable any more. But I'm missing this important feature :-( In virtusertable I could do this: @d

Re: MTAs that pass SMTP AUTH?

2003-03-31 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Scott Balmos wrote: Does anyone know of any other MTAs that can pass SMTP AUTH info along to Cyrus, other than Sendmail? I'm thinking in the base case here, of a single server, for an intranet. We've already, unfortunately, ruled out Postfix earlier last week, I think I remember reading. Exim,

MTAs that pass SMTP AUTH?

2003-03-31 Thread Scott Balmos
(originally sent with wrong email address. Sorry to the human who has to clear out the moderation mailbox. :( ) Hi all, Does anyone know of any other MTAs that can pass SMTP AUTH info along to Cyrus, other than Sendmail? I'm thinking in the base case here, of a single server, for an intranet.

Re: Which Database backend to use?

2003-03-31 Thread Christopher S. Pallone
Wow, completely missed this in the archives. Thanks for the quick response and link. It is very informative. :) Christopher S. Pallone Michaels Stores, Inc. --On Monday, March 31, 2003 12:22:21 -0500 Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christopher S. Pallone wrote: I

Re: Which Database backend to use?

2003-03-31 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christopher S. Pallone wrote: > I have noticed a couple of threads recently about the use of different > database backends with cyrus IMAPd. Can anyone explain when and where a > specific DB backend should and shouldn't be be used? Are the current > default values found in co

Which Database backend to use?

2003-03-31 Thread Christopher S. Pallone
I have noticed a couple of threads recently about the use of different database backends with cyrus IMAPd. Can anyone explain when and where a specific DB backend should and shouldn't be be used? Are the current default values found in configure.in still considered the best options for most in

Re: interesting limitation

2003-03-31 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Dave O wrote: 2 level hashing would work, but I don't know if Cyrus supports that. It would most likely be trivial to implement. eg spool/s/sm/user/smith Or in the case of full dir hashing, have a second hash function and hash the names that get assigned to one bin into an additional set of b

Re: skiplist vs. Berkeley

2003-03-31 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Dmitry Alyabyev wrote: > Which the advantages are in skiplist comparing with BerkeleyDB ? Its significantly faster for enumeration operations, which are very common with the mailbox list. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siembor

Re: interesting limitation

2003-03-31 Thread Jure Pecar
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:42:39 -0500 (EST) Dave O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2 level hashing would work, but I don't know if Cyrus supports that. It > would most likely be trivial to implement. > > eg spool/s/sm/user/smith Yes, i was thinking about that too ... In fact i would prefer it over

Re: interesting limitation

2003-03-31 Thread Dave O
2 level hashing would work, but I don't know if Cyrus supports that. It would most likely be trivial to implement. eg spool/s/sm/user/smith On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Jure Pecar wrote: > > Hi all, > > Recently i was testing a 2.2 branch on linux with Veritas vxfs. I wanted to > create 20 users

Re: skiplist vs. Berkeley

2003-03-31 Thread Dmitry Alyabyev
Florian Hars wrote: > Dmitry Alyabyev wrote: >> Which the advantages are in skiplist comparing with BerkeleyDB ? > > It doesn't show seen messages as new tree times a day. Hmm, sounds good ... Do you know why it happens ? -- Dimitry

Re: skiplist vs. Berkeley

2003-03-31 Thread Florian Hars
Dmitry Alyabyev wrote: Which the advantages are in skiplist comparing with BerkeleyDB ? It doesn't show seen messages as new tree times a day. Yours, Florian.

Re: strange quota problem...

2003-03-31 Thread Earl R Shannon
Hello, Been here done this. The first place I would look is at the quota allotted to the folder. I'd bet real money that you haven't set a quota for the folder yet. Regards, Earl Shannon Andrzej Kwiatkowski wrote: I have installed postfix 2.0.7 with Cyrus Imapd 2.1.12. My problem is a bit strange.

strange quota problem...

2003-03-31 Thread Andrzej Kwiatkowski
I have installed postfix 2.0.7 with Cyrus Imapd 2.1.12. My problem is a bit strange.. I can send only one message for test account: for example after creating imap account: bash-2.05b# cat /isp/cyrus/var/imap/quota/t/user.test123 0 20971520 and when i send mail to this account : Mar 31 14:31:1

skiplist vs. Berkeley

2003-03-31 Thread Dmitry Alyabyev
Hello According to changes to the Cyrus IMAP Server since 2.1.x: ... - The default mailbox list and seen state database formats have changed to skiplist from Berkeley and Flat, respectively. Which the advantages are in skiplist comparing with BerkeleyDB ? What about size of cache that can be cust