On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> Are you intentionally missing my point; or am I just not being
> sufficiently clear?
I'm not missing your point (I think) -- I don't agree with it.
Just because lmtp is linked to sieve is no reason to assume that they are
(or should be) functionally int
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, John Wade wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I was the one who wrote the message you found. I finally came to the
> conclusion that the flat file locking mechanism is somewhat broken in
> Cyrus, but I was never a good enough C programmer to pin down what was
> happening. (The mmap s
Hi Andrew,
I was the one who wrote the message you found. I finally came to the
conclusion that the flat file locking mechanism is somewhat broken in
Cyrus, but I was never a good enough C programmer to pin down what was
happening. (The mmap stuff makes it really tricky to debug.)I
want
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> (And if the lmtpd authors want to contradict me here; I will claim
> that messages which are not examined by Sieve should not have an
> X-Sieve header added.)
All messages that hit a sieve-compiled LMTPd are "processed by sieve" even
if that processing is
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> LMTP is not a dialect of SMTP (unless I'm reading 2033 wrong -- feel free
> to correct me if I am):
>
>Although LMTP is an alternative protocol to ESMTP, it uses (with a
>few changes) the syntax and semantics of ESMTP. This design permits
>
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> > Ah, I missed that (or forgot). X-Sieve is added as part of
> > func->addheaders, so it might be a bit more interesting...
>
> Is addheaders used for anything other than the X-Sieve header? Was it
> ever
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 17:55:42 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My measurements were not scientific. I'm sure that I overestimated the
count of messages by some factor. My point was that envelope-to does not
seem to be in wide use.
All you've managed to prove is that y
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> It wasn't clear whether you were testing incoming messages or ones
> already in mailboxes. And your statement above certainly implies that a
> bit less than 10% of the messages do NOT have a Return-Path header. Is
> that in fact the case; or was that 40,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> Ah, I missed that (or forgot). X-Sieve is added as part of
> func->addheaders, so it might be a bit more interesting...
Is addheaders used for anything other than the X-Sieve header? Was it
ever intended to be used for more?
If it was only ever inte
Ken Murchison wrote:
Nils Vogels wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Nils Vogels wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently looking for some kind of solution, that will allow me
to gateway between Cyrus and USENET.
Right now I'm using an MLM solution, that fetches certain groups
from a server, drops and drops th
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>
> > And that write lock was held by an imaps process. Once I killed the imaps
> > process, all the lmtpd's got unstuck. Unfortunately, I realize now that
> > it would have been nice to get a backtrace on t
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Hmmm, did you just add comment #1 to it? :)
Yeah. It should have been added much earlier.
> It is good to know that I can get myself out of this easily enough, but
> I'd love to see this fixed in Cyrus v2.1.16 (hint, hint). :)
Me too, but, as the c
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer not to restart all of cyrus because I have several hundred
> > users connected right now, and this is the day that all the students are
> > returning to campus. Is there a way I can kill the
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> And that write lock was held by an imaps process. Once I killed the imaps
> process, all the lmtpd's got unstuck. Unfortunately, I realize now that
> it would have been nice to get a backtrace on that imaps process to see
> why it hadn't released the l
Nils Vogels wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Nils Vogels wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently looking for some kind of solution, that will allow me
to gateway between Cyrus and USENET.
Right now I'm using an MLM solution, that fetches certain groups from
a server, drops and drops them in a Cyrus bb, but I
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote:
> I am getting many: cyrus mailer (/usr/cyrus/bin/deliver) exited with
> EX_TEMPFAIL
>
> Can someone provide some inside on what this means?
EX_TEMPFAIL means temporary failure delivering mail. In practice, that
usually means over quota.
Andy
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 13:36:18 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 02:18:50 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> out of ~40,000 messages I've got handy, between 50 and 60 had some
> varia
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> > You are assuming that sieve processing occurs -AFTER- final delivery.
> > The authors of lmtpd apparently consider it to be happening -BEFORE-
> > final delivery; with the sieve script itself determining whether there
> > will even BE a final delivery
Andrew Brink wrote:
I am getting many: cyrus mailer (/usr/cyrus/bin/deliver) exited with
EX_TEMPFAIL
Can someone provide some inside on what this means?
EX_TEMPFAIL means a temporary error, which is expected to dissolve
within time.
Nice examples are locking errors (trying to lock an already
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Brink wrote:
> Do you guys see any problems that can occur from multiple users at
> different locations check the same IMAP mailbox? (With getting the
> folder/message list in particular and maintaining their connections.)
>
> We have a customer here that has a ~500MB
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> I'd prefer not to restart all of cyrus because I have several hundred
> users connected right now, and this is the day that all the students are
> returning to campus. Is there a way I can kill the original lmtpd process
> that got stuck to free things
I am getting many: cyrus mailer (/usr/cyrus/bin/deliver) exited with
EX_TEMPFAIL
Can someone provide some inside on what this means?
Andrew Brink, CCNA, WCSP
NetStandard, Inc.
913-262-3888
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> I sent a more complete patch to devel-cyrus to cache both the Received and
> Return-Path headers. It is not writing out the X-Sieve header, though I
> can modify to cache that as well. As far as I am aware, those are the
> only three that are generate
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> You are assuming that sieve processing occurs -AFTER- final delivery.
> The authors of lmtpd apparently consider it to be happening -BEFORE-
> final delivery; with the sieve script itself determining whether there
> will even BE a final delivery at that po
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> In any case, the suggested patch would need to handle all of the
> potential headers, not just Return-path. (I still haven't quite settled
> on wether to take it or not though).
I sent a more complete patch to devel-cyrus to cache both the Received an
Ken Murchison wrote:
Nils Vogels wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently looking for some kind of solution, that will allow me
to gateway between Cyrus and USENET.
Right now I'm using an MLM solution, that fetches certain groups from
a server, drops and drops them in a Cyrus bb, but I'm trying to see
i
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Lars Peterson wrote:
> # purge trash every day at midnight
> purgetrashcmd="ipurge -f -d 1 user/*/Trash" at= period=1440
>
> # purge spam every 3 days at 1AM
> purgespam cmd="ipurge -f -d 3 user/*/Spam" at=0100 period=43212
Drop that period=
mbxclean001
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> --On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 02:18:50 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > out of ~40,000 messages I've got handy, between 50 and 60 had some
> > variant of envelope-to (either plain or with x- or old-), and 36,906
> > had a return-p
Title: Multiple IMAP Connections
Do you guys see any problems that can occur from multiple users at different locations check the same IMAP mailbox? (With getting the folder/message list in particular and maintaining their connections.)
We have a customer here that has a ~500MB IMAP Box, an
Lars Peterson wrote:
Hello all,
Wondering if anyone has had any success with using ipurge events in the
cyrus.conf file...
I would like to periodically purge all users Spam and Trash folders and was
thinking something like this would work in cyrus.conf (vs. using cron):
# purge trash every day
I'm getting a fatal error when trying to check a mailbox.
/usr/cyrus/bin/chk_cyrus -M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Examining mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bad mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] in chkmbox
fatal error: fatal error
I don't think this problem is isolated to the one mailbox though. I also
cannot add new ma
Hello all,
Wondering if anyone has had any success with using ipurge events in the
cyrus.conf file...
I would like to periodically purge all users Spam and Trash folders and was
thinking something like this would work in cyrus.conf (vs. using cron):
# purge trash every day at midnight
purget
Following up on my previous post about stuck lmtpd processes. I found
this incredibly detailed faq at:
http://www.faqchest.com/prgm/cyrus-l/cyrus-01/cyrus-0111/cyrus-011102/cyrus0023_33254.html
This isn't exactly the same problem, but the steps on that page helped me
figure out that they ar
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:32:56PM -0400, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> > GOODCHARS is designed by default to be very conservative about what it
> > allows -- we could include a number of characters that we don't because
> > they are bad in various environemnt
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 02:18:50 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 22:40:00 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep mentioning Envelope-To because 30+ years of Software Engineering
exper
Hello - I am running debian
testing with Exim (3.36) and Cyrus Imap (1.5.19). I'm
having difficulty configuring exim to deliver mail to a
sharedfolder. I created a shared folder with
cyradm, like this:linux:/var/spool/cyrus/mail# cyradm -u mailadmin
127.0.0.1127.0.0.1 password:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Denis V. Suhanov wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| I am asking because
| another problem I have here is letting users change their sasldb-based
| passwords without having to log in to the box.
look at MailAdmin http://mailadmin.sf.net/ for a php interface to th
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:56:26AM -0700, Denis V. Suhanov wrote:
> First of all, I wanted to implement incoming mail sorting via
> procmail. Considering that none of my users have local shell accounts,
> what is the right way to implementing individual procmail scripts for
> those users
I logged onto my cyrus mail server today and found that I have about 500
lmtpd process that seem to be stuck trying to deliver mail to a single
user's inbox.
I am accepting mail directly to cyrus' lmtpd from a separate machine
running postfix, which is our campus mail relay. The following is the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:32:56PM -0400, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> GOODCHARS is designed by default to be very conservative about what it
> allows -- we could include a number of characters that we don't because
> they are bad in various environemnts (especially the shell -- this
> especially comes
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Denis V. Suhanov wrote:
> First of all, I wanted to implement incoming mail sorting via
> procmail. Considering that none of my users have local shell accounts,
> what is the right way to implementing individual procmail scripts for
> those users who don't want to
Hello,
just wondered if there is a way to run cyrdeliver as another user than 'cyrus'?
Thanks in advance,
Wojtek
--
Best regards,
Wojtek mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I've already asked a few questions here and the mailing list was
extremely helpful (in fact, I only was able to start using Cyrus IMAP
server after asking around here). Once again, I want to thank
everybody who replied and helped me with my problems.
Now I have a coupl
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > I couldn't find any reason not to allow the single quote in the code or
> > the rfcs either.
>
> It would be good to know what the reason was when that code was written..
>
> > I was hoping somebody would answer this time... Although I can't tell
> >
Hello List.
How i can´t tell to cyrusv2 mailer the complete
RCPT address?. The message arrive to sendmail, sendmail detect the address as
loca-host-name, stripped the host part and call cyrusv2 with only username.
I don´t have any user into defualtdomain, all my users are or will be into
/
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:11:50AM -0400, Marc-Andre Gaudreau wrote:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > I pretty much asked the same question in this message :
> > http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&searchter
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:11:50AM -0400, Marc-Andre Gaudreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I pretty much asked the same question in this message :
> http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&searchterm=gaudreau&msg=19930
I'm sorry I missed it! I only came across a referenc
Hi Patrick,
I pretty much asked the same question in this message :
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&searchterm=gaudreau&msg=19930
I couldn't find any reason not to allow the single quote in the code or
the rfcs either.
I was hoping somebody would answer this
Hello list,
Right now, i have a problem with sendmail 8.12.10
and cyrus-imap-2_2, the first one is accepting message but cyrus-imap is unable
to deliver to the correct user inbox. My linux box is configured to use
virtualdomains support.
/etc/mail/local-host-name
xxx.com
yyy.com
/e
hello,
I have tried the Cyrus 2.2-1 Beta on RH8 and RH9.
It is very strange that the line in /etc/imapd.conf : " admins: cyrus " does
not behave the same.
Since I use saslauthd with mech=LDAP, I have the record for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (!) because
On RH8, it acts as the global admin which can modify
Just testing to see if I've cut out some of the lists with my anti-Gibe-F blocking :-)
Nix.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> --On Monday, September 22, 2003 22:40:00 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I keep mentioning Envelope-To because 30+ years of Software Engineering
> experience tells me that if you handle Return-Path, people will also
> want Envelope-To
--On Monday, September 22, 2003 22:40:00 -0700 Chris Stromsoe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
Return-Path doesn't exist at all until final delivery, at which point, I
believe it is optional.
from RFC2821 (which, I realize, is smtp and not lmtp)
When the del
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 00:01:54 -0700 Andrew Morgan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It sounds to me like the return-path header should be added when the
message is delivered to its final resting place. When sieve is looking at
the message, it hasn't been delivered yet. A sieve script may d
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> I can't believe I'm wading into this discussion... :)
:)
> It sounds to me like the return-path header should be added when the
> message is delivered to its final resting place. When sieve is looking
> at the message, it hasn't been delivered yet.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
>
> > Return-Path doesn't exist at all until final delivery, at which point, I
> > believe it is optional.
>
> from RFC2821 (which, I realize, is smtp and not lmtp)
>
>When the delivery SMTP server makes the
56 matches
Mail list logo
