Re: lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Jon Johnson
oh okay, that's good enough for me. I only wanted to run it under xinetd, cause it seemed like when i started it from master and then added a user, it didn't recognize that user right away, maybe I will just have to reload it when i do that, or maybe that was something else entirely and not related

Re: lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Joakim Ryden
On Thursday 09 October 2003 04:26 pm, Jon Johnson wrote: JJ> First, many thanks to Rob on helping with my last JJ> question. Secondly, sorry for bugging you all again, JJ> but I have been searching for info on this like mad JJ> and none applies to my problem: JJ> JJ> I have cyrus running ok when I

Re: lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Andreas Winkelmann
Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2003 01:26 schrieb Jon Johnson: > First, many thanks to Rob on helping with my last > question. Secondly, sorry for bugging you all again, > but I have been searching for info on this like mad > and none applies to my problem: > > I have cyrus running ok when I call it as >

Re: lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Jon Johnson wrote: First, many thanks to Rob on helping with my last question. Secondly, sorry for bugging you all again, but I have been searching for info on this like mad and none applies to my problem: I have cyrus running ok when I call it as "/usr/cyrus/bin/master &" , but when I try to run

Re: lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Patrick Morris
Jon Johnson wrote: I have cyrus running ok when I call it as "/usr/cyrus/bin/master &" , but when I try to run it from xinetd, I get messages that say "connect(/var/imap/socket/lmtp) failed: Connection refused" and mail doesn't get through. The short answer: Don't do that. Recent versions of C

lmtp connect problem

2003-10-09 Thread Jon Johnson
First, many thanks to Rob on helping with my last question. Secondly, sorry for bugging you all again, but I have been searching for info on this like mad and none applies to my problem: I have cyrus running ok when I call it as "/usr/cyrus/bin/master &" , but when I try to run it from xinetd, I g

Cant load postfix

2003-10-09 Thread Arturo Mardones
Hi to all!!   I follow step by step howto from http://www.delouw.ch/linux/Postfix-Cyrus-Web-cyradm-HOWTO/html/install.html and now cant load postfix.  When I review used ports I saw what smtp was not loaded. And when try start postfix throw me this error:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] catador]$

Re: problem with mailbox format

2003-10-09 Thread Jon Johnson
Oh yup, when I run "imtest -m login -p imap localhost" I get this: S: 421-4.3.0 usage: deliver [-C ] [-m mailbox] [-a auth] [-r return_path] [-l] [-D] S: 421 4.3.0 v2.1.15 failure: prot layer failure Oh shoot, I should explain: I have switched back to the proper /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver program no

Re: problem with mailbox format

2003-10-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Jon Johnson wrote: > Hmm, well I definitely installed cyrus, but I think > another imap was already on the server, so possibly I > am hitting that by accident still. If I ran cyradm and > it was connecting to the non-cyrus server, would it > still run and act as if it was creat

Re: problem with mailbox format

2003-10-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Jon Johnson wrote: > Any idea what I am doing wrong? If it helps, there was > no /etc/cyrus.conf created when I installed cyrus, so > maybe it's a setting in there I need to change, but I > don't have any file there. anyone? I'm dying on this, > I have users mad at me for the s

problem with mailbox format

2003-10-09 Thread Jon Johnson
Hi guys, I previously had cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 installed, and I am attempting to do a new install with the latest version, cyrus-imapd-2.1.15. My problem is that I have a ton of old mailboxes I need to migrate over, and on the old system when I logged into cyradm and did this: cm user.whoever it

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > Hi, > > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? > > Thanks ! You could add an explicit "discard;" after the vacation to do

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? is: if test { vacation ...; discard; } what you mean? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Etienne Goyer
Hi, It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver when vacation match ? Thanks ! -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: Message management question

2003-10-09 Thread Denis V. Suhanov
RS> Using the IMAP protocol is definately the recommended way. If your RS> client will let you use drag-and-drop, go ahead and do that. I tried that, but now every time when I am selecting my INBOX, there is a message in my IMAP client log: !09.10.2003, 08:04:06: IMAP - Cannot list headers

ipurge only for specified mailboxes

2003-10-09 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, we're considering a policy for our users where mail in the INBOX gets deleted after 1 year. The rationale for this is that people who want to archive all their mail should use separate folders. This would only affect users who use POP but leave all their mail on the server (happens all too