Return permanent failure on quota

2003-10-27 Thread Ramprasad A Padmanabhan
I want to bounce back mails immediately if the mailbox quota is exceeded. Can I do this with just some parameter change Thanks Ram

Re: Return permanent failure on quota

2003-10-27 Thread Christian Schulte
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: I want to bounce back mails immediately if the mailbox quota is exceeded. Can I do this with just some parameter change Thanks Ram Enable "lmtp_over_quota_perm_failure: 1" in imapd.conf. --Christian

sieveshell auth on sasldb

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Allison
I'm having some problems with sieveshell authentication. I can get it to work partially, but I do not understand why one works and the other does not. sieveshell documentation seems a little thin, but this is probably because it's one of those things that pretty simple to get working. I have not

Re: Hashing database files?

2003-10-27 Thread Bill Earle
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Bill Earle wrote: > > > - I hope this isn't the case. > > Why not? We are having contention problems with a single file and the multiple files may help. In our current config., deliverdb uses about 12 GB spread across our backends

Re: Cyrus RPMs

2003-10-27 Thread Etienne Goyer
Your best bet would probably be Simon Matter's rpm : http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hashing database files?

2003-10-27 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Bill Earle wrote: > Is there a good document that describes how mailboxes.db and others are > accessed? Not beyond the source code. Unless you mean vaguely, in which case: http://asg1.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/WhatDatabaseBackend May be what you need. We're trying

Re: How to tackle delegation in 2.1.15

2003-10-27 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Diego Rivera wrote: > Is this even possible in 2.1.15? I realize that granting or denying ACL > rights to the admin user at a granular per-mailbox level might be a way > to do it, but this would clearly become a maintenance nightmare. It is not possible in 2.1.15 > I realiz

Two little questions

2003-10-27 Thread Etienne Goyer
Hi list, Two questions for resident gurus this morning : 1. Is there a way to permit only POP or IMAP for a specific user ? We are currently using saslauthd + shadow (Simon Matter's rpm, for the record). 2. Apparently, we hit a bug where Oulook 2k2 seem to get confused with Cyrus's UIDL usin

Re: Two little questions

2003-10-27 Thread Ken Murchison
Etienne Goyer wrote: Hi list, Two questions for resident gurus this morning : 1. Is there a way to permit only POP or IMAP for a specific user ? We are currently using saslauthd + shadow (Simon Matter's rpm, for the record). Not using this combo. If you can use PAM, this becomes fairly triv

Re: How to tackle delegation in 2.1.15

2003-10-27 Thread Diego Rivera
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 09:04, Rob Siemborski wrote: > 2.2 has what you want. People are using it successfully in production. > It should be non-beta by the end of the year. I knew as much, and suspected the timeline you mention. However 2.2 is a non-option. Basically: at the slightest snafu, we'

Cyrus and RH9

2003-10-27 Thread arturo.mardones
Hi to all! I've been trying install Cyrus and really can't. Always appear error what can't link library libsasl2 and i install from CMU tarball. any idea??

Re: Cyrus and RH9

2003-10-27 Thread Edward Rudd
Try using Simon Matter's RPMS. http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ Then you don't have to worry about dependency issues.. But as your problem, most likely you don't have the devel package installed for cyrus-sasl. But using the RPMS will avoid that as they are already built. On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:

Re: Two little questions

2003-10-27 Thread Etienne Goyer
Thanks Ken for your helpful answer. On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:00:49PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > Etienne Goyer wrote: > > 2. Apparently, we hit a bug where Oulook 2k2 seem to get confused with > > Cyrus's UIDL using POP. My understanding of the problem is only partial > > has I was not the on