Ken Murchison wrote:
Christos Soulios wrote:
If the domain passed in the fully qualified userid matches the domain
selected
from the ipaddress, then cyrus, proceeds to authenticate user using
sasl. If it
is different, then authentication fails without even making a query to
the
authentication
Hi Christos, everyone,
Christos Soulios wrote:
Security is one thing. More than this, my opinion is that in order cyrus
to be deployed in a true multi domain environment, and thus actually be
used by ISPs, admins must be able to distribute the virtual domains
according to the name of the
Paul Boven wrote:
Hi Christos, everyone,
Security is a very important thing. And security to me means encryption,
not only of the authentication phase but of the whole session. Now with
HTTPS I know you loose the ability to support virtual domains, because
the TLS session must be setup
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:47:21AM +0100, Vittorio Manfredini wrote:
I use cyrus-imapd-2.2 and Outlook with toltec connector all fine except that
Outloock is Italian and try to create a Folder on the IMAP server with the name
Attività. This seem are not a good name for the imap server (sure for
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Boven wrote:
Security is a very important thing. And security to me means encryption,
not only of the authentication phase but of the whole session. Now with
HTTPS I know you loose the ability to support virtual domains, because
the TLS session must be setup before
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Boven wrote:
The only argument I currently completely understand for an IP-only based
setup is that of sites that need to distinguish ANONYMOUS users between
domains (and prehaps that is good enough).
What about being able to determine the virtual
Joe Rhett wrote:
My question is, how stable/reliable is 2.2.2? Could I safely use it in
a production environment? I need/want to do virtual domains. Ie,
people logging in with [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rock solid. Less problems than we had with 2.1 stable.
Would you mind
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Christos Soulios wrote:
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Boven wrote:
The only argument I currently completely understand for an IP-only based
setup is that of sites that need to distinguish ANONYMOUS users between
domains (and prehaps that is good
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Jules Agee wrote:
Would you mind briefly describing the problems you had with 2.1 stable,
and which version you were using (2.1.14/15/16...)? I am planning an
upgrade and I expect to use 2.1.16, unless someone has a pretty
compelling reason to go with 2.2.2. I don't need
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Patrick Welche wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:47:21AM +0100, Vittorio Manfredini wrote:
I use cyrus-imapd-2.2 and Outlook with toltec connector all fine except that
Outloock is Italian and try to create a Folder on the IMAP server with the name
Attività. This seem
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:09:47 +0100
Christian Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are loginrealms handled if virtdomain-support gets enabled when it was
in use before without virtdomains ?
I forgot a bit about loginrealms ... they make sense to me in a setup where
mail system is set up for
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 13:09:43 -0500 (EST)
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way to get a win out of a model that disallows that feature is to
come up with something where it actively causes problems.
Yes, and this requires active knowledge of cyrus sasl code. I think you
guys
In almost every case, all of the information available in Cyrus has
already crossed the network unencrypted, be it via SMTP between sites or
While not an universal answer, i feel the need to defend the encrypted
transport a little:
When a domain is handled by an isp, that domains internal mail
Rob Siemborski wrote:
2.2 has better process accounting in the master process. There are
limited circumstances where processes die and master will lose track of
the number of available workers. This is mostly true in
resource-constrained enviornments or when admins start killing processes
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004, Jules Agee wrote:
If I remember correctly, Henrique applies some process accounting
patches to his Debian cyrus-imapd-2.1.15 packages. Is the process
accounting functionality in 2.2 better, or is it basically the same as
what's in those patches? Henrique, can you
--
-15
200
-
1.:04325925
2.
11710510014
020-8563891113660215545
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3.
4.2003
***email,,
!,,7014;,[EMAIL PROTECTED] QQ36768830
I've been using telnet to try and debug the -ERR [SYS/PERM] Unable to open maildrop
problem but then it ocurred to me to try pop3test and it doesn't even authenticate.
# pop3test -m user -u bob localhost
S: +OK gw.lockie.ca Cyrus POP3 v2.1.15 server ready [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C: CAPA
S: +OK List
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Boven wrote:
Christos Soulios wrote:
Security is one thing. More than this, my opinion is that in order cyrus
to be deployed in a true multi domain environment, and thus actually be
used by ISPs, admins must be able to distribute the virtual domains
18 matches
Mail list logo
