Hi,
Jason Komar wrote:
I've just setup Cyrus IMAP with Open-Xchange. Currently, all our
incoming mail get's collected in a mailbox with our web hosting
provider. I was hoping to pull mail in using a utility like getmail
where when it got pulled in, it would be filtered and dropped into
local mail
Hi,
I've just setup Cyrus IMAP with Open-Xchange. Currently, all our
incoming mail get's collected in a mailbox with our web hosting
provider. I was hoping to pull mail in using a utility like getmail
where when it got pulled in, it would be filtered and dropped into
local mail directories.
Hey all:
After scouring the archives I couldn't find an answer to this particular
question:
I've cyrus imap running beautifully on a RH 8.0 box right now but I'm in a
situation where I need to move the operation onto another RH8.0 box. I've
built out the cyrus/postfix structure on the new box
Hi,
--On Montag, 22. November 2004 2:02:40 Uhr MEZ -0800 Frank Reta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After scouring the archives I couldn't find an answer to this particular
question:
it's in there, but you may not have seen it ...
I've cyrus imap running beautifully on a RH 8.0 box right now but I'm in
Hey all:
After scouring the archives I couldn't find an answer to this particular
question:
I've cyrus imap running beautifully on a RH 8.0 box right now but I'm in a
situation where I need to move the operation onto another RH8.0 box.
Do you have the same Berkley DB installed on both
* Frank Reta [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1120 10:20]:
Hey all:
After scouring the archives I couldn't find an answer to this particular
question:
I've cyrus imap running beautifully on a RH 8.0 box right now but I'm in a
situation where I need to move the operation onto another RH8.0 box. I've
Frank Reta wrote:
Hey all:
After scouring the archives I couldn't find an answer to this particular
question:
I've cyrus imap running beautifully on a RH 8.0 box right now but I'm in a
situation where I need to move the operation onto another RH8.0 box. I've
built out the cyrus/postfix
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Dick Davies wrote:
* Vernon A. Fort [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1136 15:36]:
I have squid and samba authenticating by active directory and was trying
to figure out the best approach in getting the cyrus-imap accounts to
auth via active directory as well.
Can someone
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:00:37 +, Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason, I am trying to set up cyrus with OX as well, but with LDAP for
authentication. Have you tried this?
Cheers,
Hamish
I am using saslauthd with ldap as an authentication mechanism. It
seems to be working quite
Nikola Milutinovic wrote:
Igor Brezac wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Dick Davies wrote:
* Vernon A. Fort [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1136 15:36]:
I have squid and samba authenticating by active directory and was
trying
to figure out the best approach in getting the cyrus-imap accounts to
auth via active
Hi,
today I downgraded from 2.2.8 to 2.2.3 (from SuSE 9.1), and it works
fine.
Which change(s) between 2.2.3 and 2.2.8 affect the shared-folders (as
described below)?
Have a nice day
Torsten
Torsten E. schrieb am Sonntag, 21. November 2004 13:22:
Hello list,
could somebody give me a hand, a
Hi! Netfriends,
I'm currently using cyrus-2.1.16 and it work correctly. Thanks ;-)
I need to move an already existing user to a new partition
Using cyradm, my command should be:
renamemailbox user/bob user/bob partition2
My questions are:
1. Is this the right way to move an already
Hi all,
I've been happily using cyrus-imap 2.2.8 for some time now, but I've only
had cause to use the IMAP/IMAPS service. Recently one of my users tried to
connect via POP3 to the server and was getting connection timeout errors. So
I decided to test the connection.
netstat shows the server
just wondering...
are there alternatives to the db4 backend for storing mail and such?
I am thinking in the direction of mysql. (I have openldap as well, but that
doesn't seem to be the right place to store mail)
I am really wondering about this because I just can't seem to get db4 to run
I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.2.9. This release
implements several bugfixes, notably one where lmtpproxyd could reuse a
freed connection, another involving a pre-authentication buffer overrun
in imap magic plus support (CAN-2004-1011) and lack of bounds checking
in
I'm looking to redo our companys mailserver setup, and I want to move
from our current system of POP3 to an IMAP based system. I've done a
fair amount of reading and Cyrus looks like the right answer, so I was
hoping you guys could help me out with some final details.
I have approx 500 users.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jim Bartus wrote:
I have approx 500 users. Of which probably only about 300 will be
connected at peak times, but they will be consantly connected in the
Hmm, enough IO and RAM, and Cyrus will handle that easily.
My major question is what kind of hardware will cyrus
Jim Bartus wrote:
I'm looking to redo our companys mailserver setup, and I want to move
from our current system of POP3 to an IMAP based system. I've done a
fair amount of reading and Cyrus looks like the right answer, so I was
hoping you guys could help me out with some final details.
I have
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jim Bartus wrote:
I'm looking to redo our companys mailserver setup, and I want to move from
our current system of POP3 to an IMAP based system. I've done a fair amount
of reading and Cyrus looks like the right answer, so I was hoping you guys
could help me out with some
Eddy Beliveau wrote:
Hi! Netfriends,
I'm currently using cyrus-2.1.16 and it work correctly. Thanks ;-)
I need to move an already existing user to a new partition
Using cyradm, my command should be:
renamemailbox user/bob user/bob partition2
My questions are:
1. Is this the right way to
What's the word on susceptibility of versions based on the remote
vulnerability documented at:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html
Are ALL versions of cyrus pre-2.2.9 vulnerable, including 2.1.X?
-David
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, David Powicki wrote:
What's the word on susceptibility of versions based on the remote
vulnerability documented at:
http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/152004.html
Are ALL versions of cyrus pre-2.2.9 vulnerable, including 2.1.X?
If you read the report at the URL he
22 matches
Mail list logo
