I need to have two completely separate instances imap with config
files running/
How do I achieve this task?
Please do not refer me to man pages, my OS vendor modifies these so I
don't have what everyone else has as far as man pages go.
What I am trying to achieve is the following, I have
Greg A. Woods wrote:
[ On Monday, May 30, 2005 at 22:32:37 (+0200), John Fawcett wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Double Carriage return breaks header ..
Greg A. Woods wrote:
Really your MTA should be correcting it long before it gets passed on.
is there a basis for this?
Well, maybe. :-)
As
## websrvr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I need to have two completely separate instances imap with config
> files running/
Every daemon (and other programs) from the cyrus-imapd package takes
an alternate imapd.conf with -C. The master process also takes an
alternate cyrus.conf with -M.
> Please do
On lun, 2005-05-30 at 16:43 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> The Cyrus 2.2.12 code *should* upgrade the mailboxes on the fly without
> changing the UIDVALIDITY.
>
>
This is... very good :)
Thank you very much!!!
I'll try to make few tests..
bye
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 16:01 -0400, Mark Nernberg wrote:
> The problem is that this crap comes through the Cyrus lists all the time!
>
> If it were once, I'd keep my mouth shut.
>
> And, don't give me that TrendMicro/ClamAV crap -- quality attachment
> filtering and simply disallowing attachments
I've tried to get rid of hardlinked files in our cyrus spools to make
partial mailbox restores easier and more safe. My first idea was to set
"singleinstancestore: no" in imapd.conf and make all payload files
independant from each other. Unfortunately I realized later that while
incoming messages a
Hi,
I am trying to use timsieved to manage my users' sieve scripts, instead
of putting the scripts as .sieve in the users' homedirectories. Most
users are using some filtering built in in their e-mail client, and the
few who don't use sieve. With our current setup almost all sieve users
have
Hi all,
I'm sorry to write on this mailing list but i don't have any response
from cyrus-sasl mailing list.
I use cyrus-imapd-2.2.10, cyrus-sasl-2.1.20 and openldap-2.2.18.
I whish authenticate users with need of our ldap server.
For that, i followed instructions found on web sites using the
--On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:47 AM +0200 Marco Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Server-side global content-based filtering is silly, unless of course
it's your (private) server. Users are expected to do their own
filtering, otherwise they're exposed anyway. Server-side filtering (on
publi
> I'm sorry to write on this mailing list but i don't have any response
> from cyrus-sasl mailing list.
> I use cyrus-imapd-2.2.10, cyrus-sasl-2.1.20 and openldap-2.2.18.
> I whish authenticate users with need of our ldap server.
ftp://ftp.kalamazoolinux.org/pub/pdf/LDAP103.pdf
> For that, i fol
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 09:59 -0400, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> --On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:47 AM +0200 Marco Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Server-side global content-based filtering is silly, unless of course
> > it's your (private) server. Users are expected to do their own
> > fil
I'm subscribed to the postfix and spamassassin mailing lists and they are
closed.
I think those 2 lists have a lot to do with email.
This is the only list i'm on that got hit by that german spam bot..
maybe you shouldn't discount every option to filter spam as "not worth the
effort" or "they ca
Greetings all,
I'm having a problem that makes me think I'm just over looking
something silly, but for the life of me, I can't figure out what. I am
sending emails from postfix to dspam as a mailbox_command:
/mailbox_command = /usr/bin/dspam --deliver=innocent --user $USER/
This seems to be
Kern, Tom wrote:
> I'm subscribed to the postfix and spamassassin mailing lists and they are
> closed.
> I think those 2 lists have a lot to do with email.
>
> This is the only list i'm on that got hit by that german spam bot..
>
> maybe you shouldn't discount every option to filter spam as "not
Since I use Postfix + DSPAM + Cyrus, I'll chime in.
On Debian sid, with DSPAM built by me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ls -l /usr/local/bin/dspam
~ -r-xr-sr-x 1 dspam mail 1515934 May 11 16:32
/usr/local/bin/dspam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ls -l
[ On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 at 07:31:20 (+0200), Simon Matter wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: "losing" email after delivery to cyrus
>
> Outlook does it. It's a bug which Micro$oft has fixed in Exchange, instead
> of fixing it in Outlook. Exchange generates new message IDs for every
> message because Outloo
[ On Tuesday, May 31, 2005 at 10:12:10 (+0200), Patrik Henningsson wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Double Carriage return breaks header ..
>
> So now we know that Cyrus presumably is doing wrong, any brave soul
> contribute with a patch?
I may try my hand at a patch, though not today and not likely this
Patrik Henningsson wrote:
> John Fawcett wrote:
>
>> I found out that as I'm using amavis, the message arrives ok.
>> Amavis "corrects" the bad header and adds an additional header:
>>
>> X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper use of control character (char 0D
>> hex) in message header 'Subject'
>>
Here is the somewhat "official" answer on the state of the mailing
list:
1. The list is not now, nor ever has been, open-posting. Posting is
restricted to subscribers, or to those users local to cmu.edu. The
spam posts that make it through the to the list do so because they are
sent with forge
19 matches
Mail list logo
