Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Cristian Mitrana
* Petr Vyhnal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29-08-05 23:03]: Hi all, I tried to find something at google, but without success. I have cyrus-imap 2.1.18 on Debian Sarge server, but I need bigger quotas than 2GB. Is there any patch against 2.1.18 or against 2.2.x release? Eventually, does anybody

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Scott Russell wrote: Won't this affect sieve scripts too? I thought it would require INBOX.folder to be written as INBOX/folder. Well, I ended up changing some stuff from INBOX.folder to INBOX/folder indeed. Anyway, the transition was smooth :) Thank you guys. Antoine Cyrus Home Page:

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Simon Matter
* Petr Vyhnal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29-08-05 23:03]: Hi all, I tried to find something at google, but without success. I have cyrus-imap 2.1.18 on Debian Sarge server, but I need bigger quotas than 2GB. Is there any patch against 2.1.18 or against 2.2.x release? Eventually, does anybody have

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Carsten Hoeger
On Tue, Aug 30, Simon Matter wrote: The cyrus22 debian packages have been released into the 'experimental' While we are at it, could one of the debian package maintainers provide a large quota patch? I didn't manage to backport the code from 2.3 and it seems it has been done for the

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Ondrej Sury
You missed this mail from info-cyrus: msg-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ken, would you be so kind to generate patchset (and maybe attach it to mentioned bug report)? Attached to bug #2690 -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:07 +0300, Cristian Mitrana wrote: * Petr Vyhnal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29-08-05 23:03]: Hi all, I tried to find something at google, but without success. I have cyrus-imap 2.1.18 on Debian Sarge server, but I need bigger quotas than 2GB. Is there any patch

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:52 +0200, Carsten Hoeger wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, Simon Matter wrote: The cyrus22 debian packages have been released into the 'experimental' While we are at it, could one of the debian package maintainers provide a large quota patch? I didn't manage to

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Charles Marcus
Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible using the unixhierarchy option in

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Carsten Hoeger
On Tue, Aug 30, Ondrej Sury wrote: I created it using Kens instructions from https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=1212#c13 Is there a reason why you dropped LONG LONG checks? I am not sure if all archs in Debian has support for long long datatype (mips?), so I am unsure if

ACL on shared Mailbox with LDAP group

2005-08-30 Thread Robert Weilhammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, I have some troubles with cyrus-imapd 2.2.12 on a i386 FreeBSD server. When trying to allow Fullcontrol to a mailbox like shared/test with cyradm (sam shared/test group:testmbox all) the rights are not reflected to the mailbox. All User

Re: More than 2GB quotas

2005-08-30 Thread Simon Matter
On Tue, Aug 30, Simon Matter wrote: The cyrus22 debian packages have been released into the 'experimental' While we are at it, could one of the debian package maintainers provide a large quota patch? I didn't manage to backport the code from 2.3 and it seems it has been done for the

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Charles Marcus wrote: Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1 and joe.2. I _know_ this is possible using the

Re: PIMAP (draft-maes-lemonade-p-imap-08)?

2005-08-30 Thread info-cyrus
Since there didn't seem to be any responses, sounds like this is something that'll need a financial sponsor if it is to be implemented. Amos -- Rob Carter said the following on 8/18/05 2:27 PM: Hello, Has there been any consideration given as yet to adding partial or full P-IMAP support to

Re: Solution: sieve with reject/redirect/vacation fails, sendmail exit 71

2005-08-30 Thread Razmik Ghanaghounian
Privet Sergey.. i put trusted users 'cyrus' in submit.cf and it did'nt help.. here is the cut from my submit.cf # # Trusted users # # # this is equivalent to setting class t #Ft/etc/mail/trusted-users Troot Tdaemon Tuucp Tcyrus and Nikola... the

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Russell
Charles Marcus wrote: What is the advantage/disadvantage? Is the only difference the ability to use the dot in foldernames? In other words, if you set this to true, do you *lose* anything? You loose the ability to have a / in mailbox names and gain the ability to have a . in mailbox names :)

Re: PIMAP (draft-maes-lemonade-p-imap-08)?

2005-08-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Carter wrote: Hello, Has there been any consideration given as yet to adding partial or full P-IMAP support to the Cyrus IMAP server in a future release? Alternatively, has anyone seen or heard of any work being done to build an open-source implementation of P-IMAP as a front-end for

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Claudio Saavedra
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 15:37 +, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Hello :) Stupid question really, but... ... Some time ago, I built a cyrus-imapd server with some defaults options. Everything works really fine. Today, I'm going to need to add some new users with a dot in their name, like joe.1

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread NM Public
On 30 Aug 2005, Scott Russell wrote: Charles Marcus wrote: What is the advantage/disadvantage? Is the only difference the ability to use the dot in foldernames? In other words, if you set this to true, do you *lose* anything? You loose the ability to have a / in mailbox names and gain the

Single mailbox backup

2005-08-30 Thread Jérôme NENERT
Hi, I've tried to backup a single mailbox ( user.person ) + its subfolders ( user.person.folder1 , ... ). 1) Created the mailboxes with cyradm 2) Stop cyrus, copy my backup /var/spool/cyrus/mail/n/user/person/ to the one already existing 3) Reconstruct with reconstruct -rf user.person 4)

Re: PIMAP (draft-maes-lemonade-p-imap-08)?

2005-08-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Ken Murchison wrote: Rob Carter wrote: Hello, Has there been any consideration given as yet to adding partial or full P-IMAP support to the Cyrus IMAP server in a future release? Alternatively, has anyone seen or heard of any work being done to build an open-source implementation of

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Cristian Mitrana
* NM Public [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-08-05 18:34]: [...] Another issue is that if unixhierarchy is true, plus addresses will look like this: username+directory/[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anyone know if any mail servers have a problem with a '/' in the

Re: Single mailbox backup

2005-08-30 Thread Mikael
Le Mardi 30 Août 2005 16:42, Jérôme NENERT a écrit : Hi, I've tried to backup a single mailbox ( user.person ) + its subfolders ( user.person.folder1 , ... ). 1) Created the mailboxes with cyradm 2) Stop cyrus, copy my backup /var/spool/cyrus/mail/n/user/person/ to the one already existing

Re: unixhierarchy from false to true

2005-08-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Claudio Saavedra wrote: No. You only need to consider that if you need to go back to the default configuration, every dot in a mailbox name will be converted to a ^. So the mailbox antoine.jacoutot will become antoine^jacoutot, and antoine.jacoutot/my-old-emails will become