How bad is your performance with imapcopy?
I've never had 'fast' performance with IMAP.
-Patrick
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, John Madden wrote:
I've had great experience with the performance of Cyrus thus far, but I'm
testing
a migration at the moment (via imapcopy) and I'm having some pretty stink
Brenden Conte wrote:
This looks like the problem arises if there is a child mailbox that
starts out exactly the same as the parent, and only the next character
in the child string after the end of the parent string match is a space.
Or, (!strncmp(parnet,child,strlen(parent) && child[strlen(par
On 11/4/05, John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had great experience with the performance of Cyrus thus far, but I'm
> testing
> a migration at the moment (via imapcopy) and I'm having some pretty stinky
> results. There's no iowait (4 stripes on a 2Gbps SAN), no cpu usage, nothing
> wa
I've had great experience with the performance of Cyrus thus far, but I'm
testing
a migration at the moment (via imapcopy) and I'm having some pretty stinky
results. There's no iowait (4 stripes on a 2Gbps SAN), no cpu usage, nothing
waiting on the network, and still I'm seeing terrible performan
This looks like the problem arises if there is a child mailbox that starts
out exactly the same as the parent, and only the next character in the
child string after the end of the parent string match is a space.
Or, (!strncmp(parnet,child,strlen(parent) && child[strlen(parent)+1] == '
');
Is
Hi Kevin,
--On 3. November 2005 09:08:00 -0500 Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've seen hints in the list archives about creating a mailbox called
"bb.bulletinboard". Is this "user.X" and "bb.X" syntax important to
Cyrus imapd?
yes. From the imapd.conf manpage:
sharedprefix: Shared
Here are the statistics from the first run:
Statistics
Time : 2454 sec
Messages transfered: 5820
Messages skipped : 198
Total bytes transfered : 51575344
Total bytes skipped: 29284546
Total bytes error : 18765985
Detected 1662 errors
I tried the --sk
