Great!
A very useful feature in a real multidomain environment I think!
I am currently busy working on logging some IMAP events patching imapd.c. I'll
enforce your patch immediately after that and let you know my results.
Thank you a lot.
P
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Alain Spineux [mail
>
For confirmation, the problem I had a couple of weeks ago with Cyrus
2.3.10 on a Redhat 8 derived system is fixed by forcing
HAVE_GETGROUPLIST to be undefined (I did it by deleting getgrouplist
from the list of functions checked for in configure --- there's
presumably a cleaner way).
B
> It seems silly to spend all the money for a T2000 with redundancies
> and SAN and etc. And then have it choke up when it hits (for us) about
> 10K users. It seems everyone we talk to scratches their head why this
> system with all it's cores would choke. We have found even older Sun
> V210 are
--On 8 November 2007 16:50:59 -0600 Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
> employees. It's a critical service in the sense that thousands of
> people depend on it. It has excellent performance, lots of capacity,
> and plans
Hello , I have a problem with Cyrus vacation, it just don't do
nothing, they don't generate any error on the logs, a tested other
Sieve features, like reject and they work.
I tried Cyrus 2.2 and now 2.3.8 and nothing :-(
I already searched a lot in forums and nothing, all the suggest
>> My director seems interested in outsourcing our e-mail system, judging
>> by the number of articles on outsourcing that he sends to me. Google
>> and Zimbra with a commercial contractor are the latest two. Replacing
>> a perfectly functioning e-mail system seems ludicrous to me, as does
>> sub
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 05:05:39PM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Gary Mills wrote:
> > We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
> > employees. ... I know that CMU and other universities want
> > to maintain their own e-mail systems. What's the justification in
> > these ca
> > How many
> > and what sort of people does it take to maintain a system such as
> > this? I need a good argument for hiring a replacement for me.
> At a minimum you want 1 qualified person and someone cross-trained
> as a backup, so that person can reasonably enough have vacations.
> Any decent
Hi,
I had experienced the similar problem. I have got the same error when I
was trying to build cyrus-imapd on my openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) based system.
Check the messages when you start building cyrus-imapd for these (or
similar) lines:
checking for RSAPublicEncrypt in -lrsaref... yes
checking fo
Eric Luyten wrote:
> Another thought : if your original problem is related to a locking issue
> of shared resources, visible upon imapd process termination, the rate of
> writing new messages to the spool does not need to be a directly contri-
> buting factor.
> Were you experiencing the load probl
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 19:10 +0100, Jure Pečar wrote:
> I'm still on linux and was thinking a lot about trying out solaris 10,
> but
> stories like yours will make me think again about that ...
Agreed -- with the things I see from the Solaris (and zfs) and Sparc
hardware in general, my money's stil
Jure Pečar wrote:
>
> I'm still on linux and was thinking a lot about trying out solaris 10, but
> stories like yours will make me think again about that ...
>
>
We are I think an edge case, plenty of people running Solaris Cyrus no
problems.
To me ZFS alone is enough reason to go with Solaris
Jure Pečar wrote:
> In my expirience the "brick wall" you describe is what happens when disks
> reach a certain point of random IO that they cannot keep up with.
>
The problem with a technical audience, is that everyone thinks they have
a workaround
or probable fix you haven't already thought
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:40:25 -0800
Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's something that 3 admins could do to alleviate load we did it.
>
> The bigger problem I am seeing is that Cyrus doesn't in our
> usage seem to ramp load smoothly or even predictably. It goes
> fine up to a cert
14 matches
Mail list logo
