Re: OT: Re: How many people to admin a Cyrus system?

2007-11-12 Thread Rudy Gevaert
If we could ever get a decent calendar system that works together with Cyrus or other software many people would be happy. Rudy -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+32 9 264 4734 Directie ICT, afd. Infras

Replication: problems with synctest

2007-11-12 Thread Rich Wales
OK, so I decided to try what I described earlier (replication in both directions, with different users using different master servers) . . . . But now I'm running into an authentication problem. One of my servers (my original replica) simply refuses to authenticate to the other one (my original m

Just in case it is of general interest: ZFS mirroring was the culprit in our case

2007-11-12 Thread Pascal Gienger
Our latency problems went away like a miracle when we detached one half of the mirror (so it is no more a mirror). Read-Rates are doubled (not per device, the total read rate!), latency is cut off. No more latency problems. When attaching the volume again, resilvering puts the system to a halt

OT: Re: How many people to admin a Cyrus system?

2007-11-12 Thread Scott M. Likens
Gary Mills wrote: > Thanks everyone for your responses. I don't want to clutter up this > technical mailing list with more management issues, although I'd > certainly be pleased to receive personal e-mail on this topic. > > There appear to be two types of outsourcing. The Google example was > one

how to config cyrus-imap auth with ldap directly?

2007-11-12 Thread sohu
hi, I found here is an option sasl_pwcheck_method and a lot of ldap_xxx like options. and also this in 'man 5 imapd.conf': "allowapop: 1 Allow use of the POP3 APOP authentication command. Note that this command requires that SASL is compiled with APOP support, that the plaintext passwo

Re: Replication: does it work in both directions?

2007-11-12 Thread Rich Wales
Bron Gondwana wrote: > [A mailbox list on the sync_client command line] works fine as a > one-off, but not for rolling, because rolling reads the log. Understood. > That said, only users who have had any actions on that server will > create log entries. Interesting. This actually suggests that

Re: Replication: does it work in both directions?

2007-11-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:37:12 -0800, "Rich Wales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > > It doesn't work like that. Rolling replication gets events from > > actions on mailboxes (lmtp deliver, imapd updates, etc) and logs > > them - then the sync_client process running in the back

Re: Replication: does it work in both directions?

2007-11-12 Thread Rich Wales
Bron Gondwana wrote: > It doesn't work like that. Rolling replication gets events from > actions on mailboxes (lmtp deliver, imapd updates, etc) and logs > them - then the sync_client process running in the background > reads that log file and uses the actions to know what things to > check and s

Re: Renaming heirarchies from the bottom

2007-11-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:38:54AM +, Ian G Batten wrote: > A common scenario when we are moving users between partitions is to > want to move their archived mail first, because there's less risk of > disrupting them, and then their top-level mailbox last. For a different approach - we use

Re: Replication: does it work in both directions?

2007-11-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:41:04PM -0800, Rich Wales wrote: > Earlier, I wrote: > > >> What do I need to do in order for changes made on the replica > >> to get copied over to the master? > > Bron Gondwana replied: > > > Impossible. You don't do this. What you can do (the simple > > case of wh

Multiple skiplist bugs found, patches attached

2007-11-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:34:34AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > Anyway - here it is. A "recovery()" that copes if the logstart > parameter in the database header is wrong. No, I don't have a > clue how that happened unless lseek() lied. Maybe it sometimes > lies, I don't know. I'll be writing

Re: LARGE single-system Cyrus installs?

2007-11-12 Thread Jim Howell
Hi, We run a 35,000 mailbox system with no problems on Solaris. We did a few years back have a bad time with using Berkeley DB and cyrus and switching to skiplist fixed that. I believe that problem has been solved though. I would recommend using multiple spools however, having one big on

Renaming heirarchies from the bottom

2007-11-12 Thread Ian G Batten
A common scenario when we are moving users between partitions is to want to move their archived mail first, because there's less risk of disrupting them, and then their top-level mailbox last. So we want to do: rename --partition new-partition user.name.box user.name.box and then later rena

Re: Replication: does it work in both directions?

2007-11-12 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Rich Wales wrote: > Earlier, I wrote: > >>> What do I need to do in order for changes made on the replica >>> to get copied over to the master? > > Bron Gondwana replied: > >> Impossible. You don't do this. What you can do (the simple >> case of what we do) is set up two Cyrus instances on eac