Re: Cannot get sieve working with 2.3.11

2008-02-03 Thread Albert Chin
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 08:21:44AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote: I compiled 2.3.11 on FreeBSD 6.3 but cannot get sieve working. I have a simple sieve script: $ cat china.sieve if header :contains Subject { discard; } $ sieveshell [cyrus server] put china.sieve active

Re: Cannot get sieve working with 2.3.11

2008-02-03 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on 3. Februar 2008 02:18:23 -0600 regarding Re: Cannot get sieve working with 2.3.11: -rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus 88 Feb 2 14:08 china.sieve.bc -rw--- 1 cyrus cyrus 48 Feb 2 14:08 china.sieve.script lrwx-- 1 cyrus

Re: changed to altnamespace but NAMESPACE list is wrong

2008-02-03 Thread Ken Murchison
What is your sample set of users that you have checked? Admins always use the default (internal) namespace. So in your examples below, if the second user is an admin, then the results make sense. FYI, regular users SHOULD NOT be listed as admins. Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-02

Re: changed to altnamespace but NAMESPACE list is wrong

2008-02-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 10:31 -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: What is your sample set of users that you have checked? Admins always use the default (internal) namespace. Ah ha! This is the missing link then. Yes, indeed, the sample user for which the altnamespace change was made was indeed an

Re: password verification failure

2008-02-03 Thread Ken Murchison
Is saslauthd configured and running? Michael Jørgensen wrote: This must really be a neewbie problem .-( I'm trying to connect to my IMAP server using Thunderbird. I'm not interested in SSL, so in Thunderbird I selected the radio button TLS, if possible. However, Thunderbird refuses to

Re: changed to altnamespace but NAMESPACE list is wrong

2008-02-03 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Brian J. Murrell wrote: On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 10:31 -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: What is your sample set of users that you have checked? Admins always use the default (internal) namespace. Ah ha! This is the missing link then. Yes, indeed, the sample user for which the altnamespace