Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
>> release should be considered production quality.
>
> I'm getting a regression here:
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /usr/local/libexec/cyrus-imapd/maste
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Is this a clean build and a fresh restart?
Yup...
--
Antoine
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
> Quoting Sébastien Rozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>> Thanx for all your answers, but this is not my original question :-)
>> " In fact, I don't use and don't want to use TLS, but IMAP over SSL."
>> I don't want ANYTHING running on port 143.
>> I don't want imap daemon running on my
Is this a clean build and a fresh restart?
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
>> release should be considered production quality.
>
> I'm getting a regression here:
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
> release should be considered production quality.
I'm getting a regression here:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/local/libexec/cyrus-imapd/master
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segm
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.12. This
release should be considered production quality.
Noteworthy changes:
* Added statuscache.db to cache IMAP STATUS data which
significantly reduces the amount of I/O necessary when neither the
mailbox nor \Seen state has changed --