lartc wrote:
hi,
well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
when install it for clients, i only leave a few pieces of functionality
(so they don't blow their foot off).
cheers
charles
Adam D wrote:
I have noticed this error in the log:
Sep 12 18:57:44 vts-post cyrus/imap[19629]: IOERROR: locking
/var/lib/cyrus/domain/W/domain1/user/A/userbox.sub: Interrupted system call
Soon afterwards I notice imapd runs at 99.8 % and I can not kill the
process. It looks like the file
Hello List,
The best tool to manage the cyrus is web-cyradm I think.
Is there any way to configure web-cyradm with openldap ?
Has any one done it by any chance ?
Kindly suggest.
--
~~
Joydeep Bakshi, Linux System Admin
Kolkatainfoservices Pvt Ltd,
23A
Hi,
I am in a same situation with you about system components. I have used
postfix+cyrus+ldap for email system since 2001 and system performance is
still good now. But I have to face with two problems with this system. The
first one is GUI for user and administrator. Squirrelmail was helpful
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Do Duc Huy wrote:
My question is about my second problem. It 's about antispam and antivirus.
I have used amavis for spam and virus filter. This can block virus very well
but it have no effect in blocking spam mail, I think.
Get the newest version of amavisd-new, and read
I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
comparable. Dovecot seemed to be slightly better at searching in the
mailbox, esp.
Heya :)
2008/9/17 Adam Tauno Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
comparable. Dovecot seemed
Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
only have read about it in the documentation, and not actually seen it
in action. But at least they
Hello,
2008/9/17 Simon Matter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
only have read about it in the documentation, and not
Jens wrote:
Adam D schrieb:
Adam D wrote:
I have noticed this error in the log:
Sep 12 18:57:44 vts-post cyrus/imap[19629]: IOERROR: locking
/var/lib/cyrus/domain/W/domain1/user/A/userbox.sub: Interrupted system call
Soon afterwards I notice imapd runs at 99.8 % and I can not kill
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.), yet I see no
distinctive
Wesley Craig wrote:
Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the many stone-age worries you leave behind.
;-)
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:
Do Duc Huy wrote:
Hi,
I am in a same situation with you about system components. I have used
postfix+cyrus+ldap for email system since 2001 and system performance is
still good now. But I have to face with two problems with this system. The
first one is GUI for user and administrator.
The
With ZFS your leaving a ton of stone-age worries behind. You can go
much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
Vincent Fox wrote:
Wesley Craig wrote:
Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the
...
I debated writing a gui for Cyrus for administration, but I realized
that people implement Cyrus in so many different ways. Kerberos, LDAP,
*SQL, various forms of PAM. Then you add in virtual domains, and how
you might want alias's and might not, and different MTA support... and I
just
15 matches
Mail list logo
