Wolfgang Breyha wrote, on 25.11.2008 15:35:
Am I right, that either
capa_response(CAPA_PREAUTH);
should return the needed caps for the frontends, too
I tried this, by adding CAPA_POSTAUTH in imapd.c:cmdloop() and my frontends
proxy IDLE to the backends again. This confirms my previous findings
Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
WB I tried this, by adding CAPA_POSTAUTH in imapd.c:cmdloop() and my
WB frontends proxy IDLE to the backends again. This confirms my
WB previous findings and I filed a bug:
WB https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3121
Could you post your patch, please? Or
Duncan Gibb wrote, on 26.11.2008 17:36:
Could you post your patch, please? Or attach it to the bug.
I'll post it here, since it's only a quick and dirty fix to have proof of
the bug.
Regards, Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Breyha [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.blafasel.at/
Vienna University Computer
I want to put a group: into an ACL, but I want to expand the group
using LDAP rather than /etc/groups.
A thread from this list circa 2006 seems to indicate that if PAM uses
LDAP (or NIS for that matter), that Cyrus will use LDAP without even
knowing it.
I'd actually prefer that Cyrus do this
Christopher DeMarco wrote:
I want to put a group: into an ACL, but I want to expand the group
using LDAP rather than /etc/groups.
A thread from this list circa 2006 seems to indicate that if PAM uses
LDAP (or NIS for that matter), that Cyrus will use LDAP without even
knowing it.
I'd
