Lars Hanke wrote:
BTW: It's still not working. I put it to PRI2, since the important
ldapdb stuff is running. Kerberized imap is rarely used here, so people
can do without. But still I'd like to understand, what is happening.
Is the keytab readable by the cyrus user (the Unix uid)?
Thanks,
Original Message
Subject: Storage Sizing: IOPS per mailbox
From: ram r...@netcore.co.in
To: info-cyrus info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:40:17 PM
When sizing a storage device for a large cyrus server, the typical
question asked by storage
Hm.
ReiserFS:
If I'm still following after reading through all this discussion,
everyone who is actually using ReiserFS (v3) appears to be very content
with it, even with very large installations. Apparently the fact that
ReiserFS uses the BKL in places doesn't hurt performance too badly, even
On 08 Jan 09, at 1508, Blake Hudson wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Storage Sizing: IOPS per mailbox
From: ram r...@netcore.co.in
To: info-cyrus info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Date: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:40:17 PM
When sizing a storage device for a large cyrus
(Summary of filesystem discussion)
You left out ZFS.
Sometimes Linux admins remind me of Windows admins.
I have adminned a half-dozen UNIX variants professionally but
keep running into admins who only do ONE and for whom every
problem is solved with how can I do this with one OS only?
I admin
On 02 Jan 2009, at 11:19, Lars Hanke wrote:
hermod: /var/log/auth.log
Jan 2 17:07:54 hermod imtest: GSSAPI Error: Unspecified GSS
failure. Minor code may provide more information (Decrypt
integrity check failed)
hel: /var/log/syslog
Jan 2 16:07:54 hel krb5kdc[1652]: TGS_REQ (7 etypes
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:20:00PM +0200, Janne Peltonen wrote:
If I'm still following after reading through all this discussion,
everyone who is actually using ReiserFS (v3) appears to be very content
with it, even with very large installations. Apparently the fact that
ReiserFS uses the BKL
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
(Summary of filesystem discussion)
You left out ZFS.
Sometimes Linux admins remind me of Windows admins.
I have adminned a half-dozen UNIX variants professionally but
keep running into admins who only do ONE and for whom every
On Jan 8, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
We run one zfs machine. I've seen it report issues on a scrub
only to not have them on the second scrub. While it looks shiny
and great, it's also relatively new.
Wait, weren't you just crowing about ext4? The filesystem that was
marked GA
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:03 -0500, Dale Ghent da...@elemental.org wrote:
On Jan 8, 2009, at 7:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
We run one zfs machine. I've seen it report issues on a scrub
only to not have them on the second scrub. While it looks shiny
and great, it's also relatively new.
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
(Summary of filesystem discussion)
You left out ZFS.
Sometimes Linux admins remind me of Windows admins.
I have adminned a half-dozen UNIX variants professionally but
keep
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:57:18PM -0800, Robert Banz wrote:
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
(Summary of filesystem discussion)
You left out ZFS.
Sometimes Linux admins remind me of Windows admins.
I have
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
(Summary of filesystem discussion)
You left out ZFS.
Just to come back to this - I should say that I'm a big fan
of ZFS and what Sun have done with filesystem design. Despite
the issues we've had with that machine, I know it's
Bron Gondwana wrote:
BUT - if someone is asking what's the best filesystem to use
on Linux and gets told ZFS, and by the way you should switch
operating systems and ditch all the rest of your custom setup/
experience then you're as bad as a Linux weenie saying just
use Cyrus on Linux in a how
There's a significant upfront cost to learning a whole new system
for one killer feature, especially if it comes along with signifiant
regressions in lots of other features (like a non-sucky userland
out of the box).
...
The non-sucky userland comment is simply a matter of preference, and
I am migrating mailboxes from a 32 bit cyrus (cyrus-2.3.7) to a 64 bit
cyrus (2.3.13) server
When I copy the mailbox seen flags(skiplist) from the 32 bit server to
the 64 bit servers it does not work. All the mails are flagged as unseen
on the new server
Is there a way I can migrate the seen
16 matches
Mail list logo
