What should be listening on tcp port 12345?

2009-03-25 Thread Robert Spellman
I'm in the process of adding another front end server to our cyrus email cluster. The new server is running RedHat ES5, and rpm shows the version of cyrus is cyrus-imapd-2.3.7. Our front ends provide imaps, smtp (via sendmail) and lmtp. Sendmail uses smmap to verify the recipients addrsess,

Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14 Released

2009-03-25 Thread Ken Murchison
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14. This release should be considered production quality. This is mostly a bugfix release. For full details, please see doc/changes.html and doc/install-upgrade.html which are included in the distribution. URLs for this release: ftp://ftp

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14 Released

2009-03-25 Thread Simon Matter
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14. This > release should be considered production quality. This is mostly a > bugfix release. For full details, please see doc/changes.html and > doc/install-upgrade.html which are included in the distribution. > > URLs for this release:

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Patrick Boutilier
David R Bosso wrote: --On March 13, 2009 10:18:53 AM -0300 Patrick Boutilier wrote: This will be real easy to test though. I will just run ipurge on a subfolder of my mailbox and see if it corrupts it. :-) FWIW we see the same corruption here with ipurge. We use ipurge to clean out old

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Pascal Gienger
Patrick Boutilier schrieb: > Plus you lose all the messages that are in "delayed expunge" state after > running a reconstruct. :-( Just delete cyrus.expunge in the appropriate mailboxes meta directory before running reconstruct. Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Raphael Jaffey
Quoting Patrick Boutilier : > David R Bosso wrote: >> --On March 13, 2009 10:18:53 AM -0300 Patrick Boutilier >> wrote: >> >> >> This will be real easy to test though. I will just run ipurge on a subfolder of my mailbox and see if it corrupts it. :-) >> >> FWIW we see the same corr

Cyrus IMAP Murder and (SUN)Solaris Cluster

2009-03-25 Thread Gavin Gray
Hi there, We are running a cyrus IMAP murder for thousands of users with around 3TB of mail. We have a number of backends that each have attached storage for the mail store. We are currently using solaris 10 to run the murder on. We want to try and improve the resilience of our set

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Patrick Boutilier
Raphael Jaffey wrote: Quoting Patrick Boutilier : David R Bosso wrote: --On March 13, 2009 10:18:53 AM -0300 Patrick Boutilier wrote: This will be real easy to test though. I will just run ipurge on a subfolder of my mailbox and see if it corrupts it. :-) FWIW we see the same corruptio

Re: What should be listening on tcp port 12345?

2009-03-25 Thread Andreas Winkelmann
> I'm in the process of adding another front end server to our cyrus email > cluster. The new server is running RedHat ES5, and rpm shows the > version of cyrus is cyrus-imapd-2.3.7. Our front ends provide imaps, > smtp (via sendmail) and lmtp. Sendmail uses smmap to verify the > recipients addr

Re: Re: Re: sendmail and cyrus-imap - delivery problem

2009-03-25 Thread Mario Pavlov
Hi, I've tried the new version of cyrus-imapd (2.3.14) ... it works like the previous version for me but in addition I got a strange problem with cyradm when I do: cyradm --user cyrus localhost I have to wait about a minute before I'm prompted for password could you tell me how can I set up deta

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14 Released

2009-03-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:40:55PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: > > I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.14. This > > release should be considered production quality. This is mostly a > > bugfix release. For full details, please see doc/changes.html and > > doc/install-upgrade.h

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:08:47PM -0700, David R Bosso wrote: > I'd love to see a fix for this. Here's one: >From 8448c2f304bd61fe073b1d98a0d614b69b0ee184 Subject: [PATCH] Don't immediate expunge in ipurge This has two benefits. 1) you can unexpunge 2) it won't corrupt the cache pointers in th

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:55:09AM -0300, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > David R Bosso wrote: >> --On March 13, 2009 10:18:53 AM -0300 Patrick Boutilier >> wrote: >> >> >> This will be real easy to test though. I will just run ipurge on a subfolder of my mailbox and see if it corrupts it.

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Patrick Boutilier
Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:08:47PM -0700, David R Bosso wrote: >> I'd love to see a fix for this. > > Here's one: > >>From 8448c2f304bd61fe073b1d98a0d614b69b0ee184 > Subject: [PATCH] Don't immediate expunge in ipurge > > This has two benefits. > > 1) you can unexpunge > 2

Re: unexpunge segfaults with -l on some mailboxes

2009-03-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:43:10PM -0300, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:08:47PM -0700, David R Bosso wrote: > >> I'd love to see a fix for this. > > > > Here's one: > > > >>From 8448c2f304bd61fe073b1d98a0d614b69b0ee184 > > Subject: [PATCH] Don't im