Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 3 July 2009 01:02:35 -0400 "Greg A. Woods" wrote: > At Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:26:16 -, "jul...@precisium.com" > wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked > mails? >> >> In the present commercial environment - they are more likely to "learn" >> (with the not so subtle help of certa

Cyrus IMAP mailboxes with LDAP

2009-07-03 Thread Evgeniy Arbatov
Hello, I am looking for a way to store mailbox quotas and ACLs for Cyrus IMAP in LDAP. Is there a ready made solution for this purpose? If not, how can it be possibly done? Thank you! Regards, Evgeniy Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu

Re: Db4 problems

2009-07-03 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Andrew Morgan schreef: > Here's what I recommend - get rid of Berkeley DB in Cyrus and use > skiplist instead. :) Thanks for your help. I tested it and it seemed to work. Now it's running in production for a few hours too, and I have seen no errors anymore ;-) With regards, Paul van der Vlis.

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Gary Mills
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:02:35AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > I really don't know anyone, neither amongst home-based users nor > corporate e-mail users, who truly believe they're better off with an > MS-Exchange server handling their e-mail, especially if they've > previously used a decent IM

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 3 July 2009 09:25:06 -0500 Gary Mills wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:02:35AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: >> >> I really don't know anyone, neither amongst home-based users nor >> corporate e-mail users, who truly believe they're better off with an >> MS-Exchange server handling their

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Pascal Gienger
Ian Eiloart wrote: > I was speaking to a friend who provides Exchange servers for small > businesses locally. He says that the most important thing is to have a > really good (fast, available and accurate) disaster recovery procedure, > because you need it a lot. > Here in Germany we have a

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 09:25 -0500, Gary Mills wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:02:35AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > I really don't know anyone, neither amongst home-based users nor > > corporate e-mail users, who truly believe they're better off with an > > MS-Exchange server handling their e

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> I don't like these "all in one solutions", but the people here LIKE > THEIR OUTLOOK! Everybody wants to use Outlook and our students want > Google, they like Gogle! Safe harbour for personal data? not > interesting to this youth which even posts pictures of their drunk > parties on facebo

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:25:06 -0500, Gary Mills wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails? > > There's pressure here too to move from Cyrus to Microsoft Exchange. > It seems to be coming from administrators rather than students. > > Is there someplace an unbiased comparison of the two?

Re: Cyrus IMAP mailboxes with LDAP

2009-07-03 Thread Nic Bernstein
On 07/03/2009 07:55 AM, Evgeniy Arbatov wrote: I am looking for a way to store mailbox quotas and ACLs for Cyrus IMAP in LDAP. Is there a ready made solution for this purpose? If not, how can it be possibly done? Thank you! Attached is a tar file with the tools we use for exactly this purpose.

Re: Automatically moving marked mails?

2009-07-03 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:00:20 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: Subject: Re: Automatically moving marked mails? > > Outlook users here don't like the fact that some of their MUA functionality > is greyed out. I suppose that's evidence of part of the problem -- what's greyed out is (IIUC) actually _not_

Re: Upgrade and Migration

2009-07-03 Thread Carson Gaspar
Ben Carter wrote: > If you use rsync, you have to stop everything until that finishes, > possibly reconstruct all mailboxes, maybe fix some other things before > giving people their mail functionality back and allowing mail delivery > to resume. That's just silly. If you're going to use rsync