Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Derek Yarnell wrote: > Just as an aside we archive our root mail (lots of crap) into a cyrus > mailbox and found that past 250k messages it just began to suck at > the client layer. > > What we did was have sieve filter that would be re-generated on a > monthly basis (using sie

Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Derek Yarnell
On 2/11/10 10:23 AM, Carsten Hoeger wrote: > Hi, > > > we have a customer running cyrus imap on RHEL5 cluster with a few thousand > mailboxes. > Every single mail is sent to a second host acting as a read-only archive (all > imap acls set to no write access). > > The plan is, that all mail on that

Re: Sieve and encoded Headers

2010-02-11 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:29:22AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Bron Gondwana wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:53:21AM +0100, Garry wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>after wondering for a while why occasionally my sieve script rules > >>wouldn't work, I just found the reason (I guess) - Sieve does

Change "plus" character?

2010-02-11 Thread Charles Boling
Is there a way [that doesn't require recompiling] to change the character that Cyrus IMAP uses for "plus addressing" from "+" to something else? Thanks. Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu

How to make sync_client invoke STARTTLS for replication

2010-02-11 Thread Rich Wales
I'm running Cyrus 2.3.16 (with replication) between two Ubuntu servers. What do I have to do to make the "sync_client" application invoke STARTTLS when it connects to "sync_server" on the other host? I can invoke TLS when I use the "synctest" program, but I can't seem to figure out how to force "

Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:37:20AM +1100, Rob Mueller wrote: > > >>> It's quite likely, that these mailboxes will grow to 50 or > >>even > more then > >>> 1M mails per mailbox. > >>> > >>> Does anybody have experience with such big mailboxes? > >> > >>Is the I/O cost of message adding relativ

Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Rob Mueller
>> > It's quite likely, that these mailboxes will grow to 50 or even >> > more then >> > 1M mails per mailbox. >> > >> > Does anybody have experience with such big mailboxes? >> >> Is the I/O cost of message adding relative to O(n), n being the number of >> msgs >> already in the mailbox, o

Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:39:25PM +0100, Eric Luyten wrote: > On Thu, February 11, 2010 4:23 pm, Carsten Hoeger wrote: > > > > > we have a customer running cyrus imap on RHEL5 cluster with a few thousand > > mailboxes. Every single mail is sent to a second host acting as a read-only > > archive (

Re: Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 12:02 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > On 2/11/10 11:55 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:35 -0500, Zachariah Mully wrote: > >> Howdy all- > >> Is anyone out there running Cyrus on an Amazon EC2 instance with EBS? > >> During these brutal storms we've

Re: Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Zachariah Mully
On 02/11/2010 12:02 PM, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > On 2/11/10 11:55 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> I run Cyrus on a Linode VM. I've been *very* happy with them. And it >> is just a 'normal' virtual server and not any odd-ball cloud thing. >> > > > I wonder how people deal with the disk I/O d

Re: Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Simon Fraser
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 12:02 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > I run Cyrus on a Linode VM. I've been *very* happy with them. And it > > is just a 'normal' virtual server and not any odd-ball cloud thing. > > > I wonder how people deal with the disk I/O deficiency under virtual > systems s

Re: Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Forrest Aldrich
On 2/11/10 11:55 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:35 -0500, Zachariah Mully wrote: > >> Howdy all- >> Is anyone out there running Cyrus on an Amazon EC2 instance with EBS? >> During these brutal storms we've had in the DC area, we've been >> discussing how to improve

Re: Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:35 -0500, Zachariah Mully wrote: > Howdy all- > Is anyone out there running Cyrus on an Amazon EC2 instance with EBS? > During these brutal storms we've had in the DC area, we've been > discussing how to improve the resiliency of our operations and getting > our mail sys

Re: cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Eric Luyten
On Thu, February 11, 2010 4:23 pm, Carsten Hoeger wrote: > > we have a customer running cyrus imap on RHEL5 cluster with a few thousand > mailboxes. Every single mail is sent to a second host acting as a read-only > archive (all imap acls set to no write access). > > The plan is, that all mail on

Cyrus on Amazon EC2 and EBS?

2010-02-11 Thread Zachariah Mully
Howdy all- Is anyone out there running Cyrus on an Amazon EC2 instance with EBS? During these brutal storms we've had in the DC area, we've been discussing how to improve the resiliency of our operations and getting our mail systems out of our CO and into a datacenter is high on the li

Re: Cyrus murder ( IMAP Aggregator )

2010-02-11 Thread Wesley Craig
On 10 Feb 2010, at 16:54, Richard Pijnenburg wrote: > How do the backends deceide who services which mailbox? > The admin decides, more or less, as you provision mailboxes. > And what happens if one of those backends dies? > The mailboxes on that backend are inaccessible. The rest of the clus

cyrus and 500k to >1M mails per inbox

2010-02-11 Thread Carsten Hoeger
Hi, we have a customer running cyrus imap on RHEL5 cluster with a few thousand mailboxes. Every single mail is sent to a second host acting as a read-only archive (all imap acls set to no write access). The plan is, that all mail on that second host is kept for a long time. After some years, o