Occasionally weird behaviour with mboxes

2010-05-18 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
It's some times a few user of mine lament a strange behaviour: they see 'gray' folders in thunderbird, but it happens *very* rarely... btw these people have 6-10 GB of mail in their folders if it can be useful! A protocol trace revealed that, indeed, the mbox is sent as noselect: -- crbrm

Re: Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 20:53 +0200, Frank Richter wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > We use shared mailboxes quite extensively for role-based communication. > > For quite some time we've had a problem with users deleting or renaming > > mailboxes into which we deliver mail. We can, and do, use IMAP ACLs to

Re: Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Stephen Grier
On 18/05/10 18:47, Wesley Craig wrote: > Seems like a reasonable approach and a good patch. I might suggest > some feedback, preferably to the deleting / renaming user but a > syslog might also do, when the delete / rename failed. My patch returns IMAP_MAILBOX_NOTSUPPORTED to the client. I ca

mbox annotations survive mbox deletion

2010-05-18 Thread Martin Kraus
Hi. Using perl IMAP::Admin library, annotations for the given mailbox survive mailbox deletion. Is there a way do delete all annotations for the given mailbox or do I have to set all the available annotations to "none" before I delete a mailbox? Also what other things survive mailbox deletion? t

Re: Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Nic Bernstein
This looks like a great addition. One question: Where in the documentation should information be added describing this new annotation? Where are available annotations documented currently? Thanks for the contribution! -nic On 05/18/2010 12:47 PM, Wesley Craig wrote: > Seems like a reason

Re: Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Frank Richter
Hello Stephen, > We use shared mailboxes quite extensively for role-based communication. > For quite some time we've had a problem with users deleting or renaming > mailboxes into which we deliver mail. We can, and do, use IMAP ACLs to > dissallow users from deleting the delivery target mailbox. B

Re: Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Wesley Craig
Seems like a reasonable approach and a good patch. I might suggest some feedback, preferably to the deleting / renaming user but a syslog might also do, when the delete / rename failed. Is there a bugzilla number? :wes On 18 May 2010, at 12:38, Stephen Grier wrote: > Just submitting a patch

Patch: add new lmtptarget annotation

2010-05-18 Thread Stephen Grier
All, Just submitting a patch I'm supporting locally for consideration. We use shared mailboxes quite extensively for role-based communication. For quite some time we've had a problem with users deleting or renaming mailboxes into which we deliver mail. We can, and do, use IMAP ACLs to dissallow u