On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:19:36 David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
> >>
> >>cyrus.header.
> >>
> >> 4) like (3) - but check that there'
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:31:40AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang"
> > wrote:
> >>I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
> >>INBOX.sub.folder1
> >>and INBOX.sub.folder2
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang"
> wrote:
>> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
>> INBOX.sub.folder1
>> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
>>
>> if you were to create INBOX.sub
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang"
> wrote:
>> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
>> INBOX.sub.folder1
>> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
>>
>> if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could th
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang"
> wrote:
>> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
>> INBOX.sub.folder1
>> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
>>
>> if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user di
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang"
wrote:
> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing
> INBOX.sub.folder1
> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism
>
> if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could they
> remove
> it without af
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
>>cyrus.header.
>>
>> 4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
>>OR at least one message file in the
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
>cyrus.header.
>
> 4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
>OR at least one message file in the directory before
>creating the mailbox. (so
On 2011-04-26 at 07:07, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
> Everybody seems to like 3. But if you only have an empty directory with
> no message files or something that resembles a cyrus file what is the
> point of creating an empty folder? :-)
I don't see why we'd suddenly get a spurious empty directory
On 04/26/2011 06:52 AM, Øyvind Kolbu wrote:
> On 2011-04-23 at 10:34, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
>>> cyrus.header.
>>>
>>
>> This one has my preference.
>
> Mine as well.
Everybody seems to lik
On 2011-04-23 at 10:34, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
> >cyrus.header.
> >
>
> This one has my preference.
Mine as well.
--
Øyvind Kolbu
Postmaster
Universitetet i Oslo
pgppS7kNclXEU.pgp
Descr
> On Saturday 23 April 2011 01:07:00 Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> The question came up from the following bug report:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
>>
>> Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left.
>> Reconstruct gave no information about the files o
On Saturday 23 April 2011 01:07:00 Bron Gondwana wrote:
> The question came up from the following bug report:
>
> http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
>
> Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left.
> Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk
13 matches
Mail list logo
