On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, gavin.g...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
> As you may be aware we are attempting this and have run into various
> problems.
>
> Currently we have a mixed murder of 2.3.15 backends and 2.4.17 backends.
> We are now fairly confident that we can xfer accounts succesfully between
> these backend
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 16:15 +0100, gavin.g...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
> As you may be aware we are attempting this and have run into various
> problems.
>
> Currently we have a mixed murder of 2.3.15 backends and 2.4.17 backends.
> We are now fairly confident that we can xfer accounts succesfully betwee
As you may be aware we are attempting this and have run into various
problems.
Currently we have a mixed murder of 2.3.15 backends and 2.4.17 backends.
We are now fairly confident that we can xfer accounts succesfully between
these backends. The problems we had appear to have been with a very s
On 06/05/2014 05:33 AM, Jean-Christophe Delaye wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After successfully tested Cyrus IMAPD v2.4.17-caldav on a "stand-alone"
> Cyrus IMAP server, I wonder how to integrate "CalDAV" features in our
> running Imap systems.
> We're currently using 2 murder hosts and 4 backend servers, runni
Hi,
After successfully tested Cyrus IMAPD v2.4.17-caldav on a "stand-alone"
Cyrus IMAP server, I wonder how to integrate "CalDAV" features in our
running Imap systems.
We're currently using 2 murder hosts and 4 backend servers, running in a
cluster (Solaris) environment. Users mailboxes are dis