Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and > since then the sync_client is running wild on this user account and > produces high load on the master. I stopped sync_client on master

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: Hi, I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and since then the sync_client is running wild on this user account and produces hig

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Hi, Quoting Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus : On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: Hi, I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and since then the sync_client is

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Menge via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > > Quoting Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus : > > > On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > >> Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via > >> Info-cyrus: > >

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 07:31 -0400 schrieb Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus: > On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via > > Info-cyrus: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user'

Re: Trouble with Outlook 2013, especially with the upgrade from 12/8

--On 11. Dezember 2015 um 16:52:07 +0200 Leena Heino via Info-cyrus wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, André Schild via Info-cyrus wrote: Outlook and IMAP is just pain, it's not intended to work, otherwise who would buy the exchange server? 1) We see this rather seldom, but sometimes mails come i

Security release for 2.4 series?

Hello all. We're trying to sort through our path here with patching for the CVE/commits that were released in 2.5.7, but also relevant to 2.4.18. We're currently on 2.4 series, and I was wondering what the plans were for a 2.4 release to address these security fixes. While moving to 2.5 is in the

strange difference between master and replica account

Hi, another problem on another account: on the master on the file system there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 GB account size). Connecting with an IMAP client shows 60 mails and an "unexpunge -l" shows 400 delete mails in the INBOX. On replica side the INBOX the

Re: Security release for 2.4 series?

Hello all. Sorry about following up to my own email, but I think I understand the changes now to 2.4.18 in order to make it CVE compliant. As best I can understand, if I apply the two commits from Ellie Timoney on 10/26/2015, 2.4.18 would be "secure" once recompiled. These two commits appear to

Re: strange difference between master and replica account

Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:36 +0100 schrieb venc: > On 2015-12-14 16:16, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > another problem on another account: on the master on the file system > > there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 > > GB account si

Re: strange difference between master and replica account

Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:16 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > another problem on another account: on the master on the file system > there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 > GB account size). Connecting with an IMAP client shows 60 mails an

Re: Security release for 2.4 series?

Hi Tim, Yeah, those are the correct two commits. >> My other concern was that, honestly, I'm not all that sure what the >> true risk and capability to exploit is for these bugs.  I've read the >> CVE's, and associated discussions on the a few lists - but it hasn't >> enlightened me as much as I'v