Hi Jack,
You should be able to export the mailboxes database on the old server to
text and then import on the new server. In package of cyrus we are
running, the DB export is actually done daily automatically.
Here is an approximation of what we did last time we did a
server/version migrat
On 04/06/2016 01:32 PM, Dan White wrote:
On 04/06/16 13:20 -0500, Jack Snodgrass via Info-cyrus wrote:
Is there a documented process for taking a system from: Cyrus
v2.2.13 to Cyrus v2.4.17
Check the upgrade instructions here:
https://cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-imapd/2.5.3/install-upgrade.php
I read that.. but after 8 hours of trying to get it going I gave up on it.
I the debian 8 / Cyrus 2.5 stuff did not want to process the cyrus 2.4
db files from debian 6.
You can say pretty words like: "may require support for whichever
backend you were using" but if all you have is access to
Tried to go to 2.5 and had more serious issues than going to 2.4. From
the top of my head I don't recall what it was...
I've still got the 2.5 binaries laying around. Do you have a successful
migration path from 2.2 to 2.5 that I can do? I've been told that the
'seen' flags is a big deal for m
On 04/06/16 13:20 -0500, Jack Snodgrass via Info-cyrus wrote:
Is there a documented process for taking a system from: Cyrus v2.2.13
to Cyrus v2.4.17
I have rsync'd the mail between the two systems.
/usr/lib/cyrus/bin/reconstruct did NOT magically convert the system
from the old to the new.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:20:13PM -0500, Jack Snodgrass via Info-cyrus wrote:
> Is there a documented process for taking a system from: Cyrus
> v2.2.13 to Cyrus v2.4.17
>
> I have an old debian box with Cyurs v2.2.13.
>
> I have a new debian box with Cyrus v2.4.17
>
> Is there a documented / of
Is there a documented process for taking a system from: Cyrus v2.2.13 to
Cyrus v2.4.17
I have an old debian box with Cyurs v2.2.13.
I have a new debian box with Cyrus v2.4.17
Is there a documented / official process for migrating mail like this?
I could not find one.
I have rsync'd the ma
On 06.04.2016 18:54, Stephen Ulmer wrote:
> You ignored my point about being a good citizen. I’m talking about what you
> PUBLISH, how it is useful to others, and how it will eventually lend
> protection to your users reputations as the number of DMARC implementations
> increases.
In my last
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Binarus via Info-cyrus
> wrote:
>
> On 06.04.2016 02:54, Stephen Ulmer wrote:
>> You make some good arguments, but then you say other things that make me
>> think you’re not clueful. I think you’ll be more persuasive if you consider
>> the following:
>
> Indee
On 06.04.2016 02:54, Stephen Ulmer wrote:
> You make some good arguments, but then you say other things that make me
> think you’re not clueful. I think you’ll be more persuasive if you consider
> the following:
Indeed, I'm not clueful regarding DMARC. Regarding SPF, DKIM and SMTP in
general,
Thanks Nic that looks useful
Unfortunately ‘info' doesn’t seem to function on our installation:
localhost> lm shared/mbujobs
shared/mbujobs (\HasChildren)
localhost> lam shared/mbujobs
jt lrswipkxtecda
merlin lrs
anonymous p
ij lrswipkxtecda
localhost> info shared/mbujobs
localhost>
localhost>
On 03/18/2016 05:48 AM, Merlin Hartley via Info-cyrus wrote:
...
Of course, over-time more complexity is always required and I have
recently implemented a few shared mailboxes (rather than just sharing
user mailboxes).
Inevitably, the users are now asking for an auto-reply to be
configured for
Zitat von Paul Bronson via Info-cyrus :
I am looking for an open source Cisco Ironport type email message
encryption solution that is open source. I've looked for years but
can't find anything. Anyone have an ideas?
We use this one since some years :
http://www.djigzo.com/
It's a full
13 matches
Mail list logo
