Re: Cyrus doesn't preserve hard-links on replication

2019-11-18 Thread Adrien Remillieux
g, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Info-cyrus digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. Cyrus doesn't preserve hard-links on replication > (Adrien Remillieux) > > > --

Re: Cyrus doesn't preserve hard-links on replication

2019-11-18 Thread Adrien Remillieux
than "Re: Contents of Info-cyrus digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Cyrus doesn't preserve hard-links on replication > (Adrien Remillieux) > > > ------ > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 17 Nov

Cyrus doesn't preserve hard-links on replication

2019-11-17 Thread Adrien Remillieux
Hello, I set up replication between two cyrus servers (master runs 2.5.10 and slave 3.0.8) with plans to decommission the old server once everything is working. I noticed that the mail spool takes 950GB instead of ~300GB on the old server. I suspected the hardlinks for message deduplication

Re: Possible issue when upgrading to cyrus 3.0.8 using replication ?

2019-09-17 Thread Adrien Remillieux
t mind slow while the > source server is still online and users are happy. > > On 9/14/19 5:12 PM, Adrien Remillieux wrote: > > Thank you for your answer ! > > > > Considering what you said I'll try to enable replication on the new > > server. If it doesn't work I'

Possible issue when upgrading to cyrus 3.0.8 using replication ?

2019-09-11 Thread Adrien Remillieux
Hello, I have a server that I can't update running cyrus 2.5.10 which contain mailboxes that have existed from 2.3 and earlier (around 300Gb total). My plan is to update by enabling replication with a new server running Debian Buster (so cyrus 3.0.8) and then shutting down the old server. There