Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote: > >>Or one could do away with DBD entirely and switch to skiplist. > > > >Is this a good idea for true hash databases such as the delivery database > >and TLS session database

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Ken Murchison
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:53:58AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Curtis Robinson wrote: 4. Upgrade to BDB 4.2.something, **recompile cyrus against it** 5. db_upgrade 6. Configure the ber

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:53:58AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Curtis Robinson wrote: > > 4. Upgrade to BDB 4.2.something, **recompile cyrus against it** > > 5. db_upgrade > > 6. Configure the berkeley DB environment

RE: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Curtis Robinson
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Ringer Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:34 AM To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 21:53, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > This is

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 23:09, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > You'd need to version symbols in [all instances of] the library for that to > not blow in your face. The same goes for libsasl, libldap, and anything > else different libs would like to link/dlopen to at the same time. [stupid non

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Craig Ringer wrote: > I've certainly never had much luck with it, and prefer to link against a > bdb4.2 build in /usr/local for site-local apps installs. Of course, then > you can run into all _sorts_ of fun if a PAM or nss module you use > happens to be linked to a different v

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Etienne Goyer
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:53:58AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Curtis Robinson wrote: > 4. Upgrade to BDB 4.2.something, **recompile cyrus against it** > 5. db_upgrade > 6. Configure the berkeley DB environment, it has precedence over >anything Cyrus tries t

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 21:53, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > This is not guaranteed to fix your problem, but it just might. If your > machine is SMP on Linux, it is almost guaranteed that DB 4.1 will give you > severe headaches. If I remember correctly, the bdb that ships with Red Hat 9 and

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004, Curtis Robinson wrote: > The berkeley db version is 4.1.25. This problem is new. This system has been > running for monthes > with changing the software. So, it is hard to say what the problem is. I will try > the debugging > route, but that is terrority I am not familia

RE: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Curtis Robinson
route, but that is terrority I am not familiar with. I will do the ulimit on memory and see what happens. -Original Message- From: Craig Ringer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 4/2/2004 3:27 AM To: Curtis Robinson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production

RE: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Curtis Robinson
\ --with-auth=unix -Original Message- From: Michael Loftis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 4/2/2004 3:06 AM To: Curtis Robinson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box I'm cynical, but I'd say it's a Redhat problem LOL...more seriously

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 15:54, Curtis Robinson wrote: > Hello, > > I need major assistance. We have a dual cpu w/ 2GB of RAM. Recently, lmtpd and > imapd processes have been eating up all available memory to the point the machine > stops responding. I have try to reconstruct every mailbox and f

Re: BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Michael Loftis
I'm cynical, but I'd say it's a Redhat problem LOL...more seriously though what is the size of your dbs mailboxes file, what DB type? Any particularly 'bushy' mailboxes? --On Friday, April 02, 2004 02:54 -0500 Curtis Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I need major assistance. We hav

BIG PROBLEM: Need help with production box

2004-04-02 Thread Curtis Robinson
Hello, I need major assistance. We have a dual cpu w/ 2GB of RAM. Recently, lmtpd and imapd processes have been eating up all available memory to the point the machine stops responding. I have try to reconstruct every mailbox and fix the mailbox database, but nothing has fixed it. Some of