On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, David Carter wrote:
One small curiosity is that the memory use per IMAP session seems
to have increased dramatically. I'm looking at the output of the
Linux free command after buffer cache has been subtracted:
2.3.14: 2572296 KBytes with 2909 IMAP sessions: 884
We are currently in the process of migrating from 2.3.14 (with lots
of local patches) to a fairly vanilla 2.4.13.
One small curiosity is that the memory use per IMAP session seems
to have increased dramatically. I'm looking at the output of the
Linux free command after buffer cache has been
David Carter wrote, on 08.02.2012 17:19:
It looks like 3000 IMAP sessions are going to take around 8 GBytes of RAM
just to run, and we will need to buy additional RAM for buffer cache. This
isn't the end of the world: memory is cheap. I'm just curious if anyone
else saw a similar increase
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 04:19:42PM +, David Carter wrote:
We are currently in the process of migrating from 2.3.14 (with lots
of local patches) to a fairly vanilla 2.4.13.
One small curiosity is that the memory use per IMAP session seems
to have increased dramatically. I'm looking at the
It looks like 3000 IMAP sessions are going to take around 8 GBytes
of RAM just to run, and we will need to buy additional RAM for
buffer cache. This isn't the end of the world: memory is cheap. I'm
just curious if anyone else saw a similar increase when upgrading
from 2.3 to 2.4.
I
How to estimate the memory usage in cyrus imap 2.4.X ?
Mailbox size is Important ?
For example 5000 simultaneous IMAPS in mailboxes with 2Gb size.
How much memory is needed?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Robert Mueller r...@fastmail.fm wrote:
It looks like 3000 IMAP sessions are
