Hi,
i have to correct some information
Quoting Michael Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Shared filesystem Active/Passive
This setup can add HA to a normal Cyrus server by storing the Mails and
databases on a shared filesystem and monitoring the server with heartbeat.
This setup should work
Hi,
Quoting Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Michael Menge wrote:
The following shared Filesystems seem support the file-locking
GFShttp://sources.redhat.com/cluster/gfs/
Lustre http://www.lustre.org/
NFSv4
Michael Menge wrote:
I know that this list is not complete so feel free to add more shared
filesystems to the list.
Maybe we should share oure expirience with these filesystems and discus
advantages and disadvantages.
What about Lustre? Anybody has tried this in combination with
Quoting Yuri Gorshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michael Menge wrote:
I know that this list is not complete so feel free to add more
shared filesystems to the list.
Maybe we should share oure expirience with these filesystems and
discus advantages and disadvantages.
What about Lustre?
Great summary Michael.
I have a few questions on what a shared filesystem hardware
CAN be:
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server (disk)
at a time...so this does not allow for
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server (disk)
at a time...so this does not allow for a shared FS ?
Yes, much like only one host can connect to an FC LUN at once. :) iSCSI
At Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:24:44 -0300,
Marcelo Maraboli wrote:
I have a few questions on what a shared filesystem hardware
CAN be:
- iSCSI storage ? (cheap GigaEthernet SAN)
according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI ,
only 1 iSCSI-client can be connected to 1 iSCSI-server
Hi,
the Cyrus (HA and LB) Cluster question seems to popup very often the
last months. With this post I try to summarize the info of the posts
of the
following threads:
- Cyrus IMAP and MySQL mailboxes (Building load-balancing cluster)
- NFSv4, anyone?
- Cyrus, clusters, GFS - HA yet again
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Michael Menge wrote:
the Cyrus (HA and LB) Cluster question seems to popup very often the
last months. With this post I try to summarize the info of the posts
of the
following threads:
Thanks. This is valuable information.
The following
