Hello mates!
Apoligies for so big delay have been in a high load work days We
have finally declined using NFS,
Thanks a lot to all!!
Best regards,
El 9/2/17 a las 10:25, Niels Dettenbach via Info-cyrus escribió:
Am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017, 17:24:19 CET schrieb Egoitz Aurrekoetx
Am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017, 17:24:19 CET schrieb Egoitz Aurrekoetxea via
Info-cyrus:
> I think it should be very similar to using a local filesystem... Does
> anyone can tell some experience in this config?..
I know one older "smaller" cyrus setup with i.e. 100 IMAP/POP-Users which has
it's co
On 09/02/17 09:53, Paolo Cravero via Info-cyrus wrote:
From our storage admins: "One advantage of having most of the
obsolete-but-keep-it-i-might-need-it-one-day data not on a local filesystem
is that in the rare event of system crash you will not have to wait for fsck
to complete, as it must
Hello.
> I know this is a very tipical question but... nowadays... how does Cyrus
> IMAP work with NFS 4?. It supports file locking and I would only mount
> each mail spool in an own unique server... so
>
> I think it should be very similar to using a local filesystem... Does
> anyone can tell
Good afternoon,
I know this is a very tipical question but... nowadays... how does Cyrus
IMAP work with NFS 4?. It supports file locking and I would only mount
each mail spool in an own unique server... so
I think it should be very similar to using a local filesystem... Does
anyone can tell
